Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

VTC cam gear?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gegge  



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1124
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am interested depending on design and specifications.

Looking for something more robust than Francos design. The Toyota VVT seems rigid but is hydralic. Guessing that a mechanical system with centrifugal weights is good enough shifting at 4000 rpm. The range in my opions should be +7/-3 degrees.
_________________
Carl Fredrik Torkildsen

924 turbo -81 Carrera GT RESTOMOD
924 turbo -80 Dolomite De Luxe
924 -85 DP kit, BBS RS, M030 and tuned engine
924s -86 Black on black turbo with Fuchs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
morghen  



Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 9095
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gegge wrote:
I am interested depending on design and specifications.

Looking for something more robust than Francos design. The Toyota VVT seems rigid but is hydralic. Guessing that a mechanical system with centrifugal weights is good enough shifting at 4000 rpm. The range in my opions should be +7/-3 degrees.


+1
_________________
Supercharger and EFI kits
https://www.the924.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
tyfighter123  



Joined: 19 Jan 2010
Posts: 551
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im interested.

Tyler
_________________
Porsche 924 1977 N/A
Mustang GT/CS 2007
Porsche 924S 1987 (parts car)(cut up and recycled)
Porsche 911S 1976
Porsche 931 1980
Porsche 931 1980 (parts car)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
gegge  



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1124
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was thinking yesterday and ended up with two suggestions of simple mechanic variable cam gears.

I am looking for simplicity and reability, hence few strong parts. I want a "limp-home" mode just in case of failure. Worst case is a cam gear that doesn´t work meaning locked in a position close to stock. A camgear that does work on an interference engine.

The coilspringload version work with the resulting torque when turning the cam. I belive that the torque required is proportional to the increased rpm. When not running or idle, the springs are at full lenght and the cam is advanced 10 degrees. The more you increase the revs, the more the springs get compressed. At a certain rpm they are fullt compressed and the inner impeller is touching the outer impelled of the cam gear. The gear has retarded the cam from 10 degrees advanced to stock.


The wedgeweight and spring version relies on the centrifugal force. At idle the springs are pressing the wedges to the center and advancing the cam fully. As the revs increase, the weight of the wedges are forced outwards and the gap between the impellers are decreasing and the cam is retarded to stock.

_________________
Carl Fredrik Torkildsen

924 turbo -81 Carrera GT RESTOMOD
924 turbo -80 Dolomite De Luxe
924 -85 DP kit, BBS RS, M030 and tuned engine
924s -86 Black on black turbo with Fuchs


Last edited by gegge on Thu Nov 06, 2014 4:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeDanger  



Joined: 21 Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Location: Denver

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

heres the basic drawing, still a bit of work to do:


_________________
It was either this or a giant box of legos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Shurick  



Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 524
Location: Russia, Moscow.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MikeDanger wrote:
heres the basic drawing, still a bit of work to do:

From your drawings it will be changing timing with acceleration influence, not revolution speed. And keep in mind that the spring load will vary with weight position because spring attachment points will move with revs and crank angle acceleration.
_________________
WBR, Shurick
'79 931 -- intercooled K26-3060-6.10 turbo @ 1.2 bar, EFI+EDIS, 951S brakes, stripped interior, 951 look.
'86 924S -- R.I.P.
https://www.instagram.com/ru_pacecar/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
MikeDanger  



Joined: 21 Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Location: Denver

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shurick wrote:
MikeDanger wrote:
heres the basic drawing, still a bit of work to do:

From your drawings it will be changing timing with acceleration influence, not revolution speed. And keep in mind that the spring load will vary with weight position because spring attachment points will move with revs and crank angle acceleration.


how so? it's functionally the same as the franco
_________________
It was either this or a giant box of legos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
!tom  



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1941
Location: Victoria, BC Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gegge wrote:
The coilspringload version work with the resulting torque when turning the cam. I belive that the torque required is proportional to the increased rpm. When not running or idle, the springs are at full lenght and the cam is advanced 10 degrees. The more you increase the revs, the more the springs get compressed.

No, this is not the case. The torque required to turn the cam gear is proportional to the drag. The drag is comprised of three components, the cam action of the cams acting against the springs (both positive and negative forces), frictional force of the cam lobes against the lifters and cam bearings against the caps, and a damping force from the shearing of the oil film.

It is the damping from the oil shearing force that will have a speed proportional component, but this is minor compared to the other forces at play.

A centrifugal approach is a more obvious approach to get an advance proportional to RPM, much like a distributor.
_________________
78 924 NA
5-lug
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
morghen  



Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 9095
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By no means i claim to be allknowing so dont get me wrong, i really am trying to help. I was also thinking of designing such a device but its very complicated and it would take me alot of time. I'm a design engineer, i have been designing parts and assemblies for the automotive industry for the past 7 years...so if you can take some constructive criticism..

Your design is weak and difficult to produce in a precise way.
Let me explain why and make a comparisson to the Franco gear which is also weak as it was proven to break and destroy engines.

Here is your weak point: The seating/sliding surface for the actuation is actually smaller than the Franco gear, the Franco gear uses an 6 or 8mm diameter pin on the drive plate that engages on the gear housing and controls the advance/retard curve.
So your mistake here is to design a smaller friction/seating/sliding surface than the Franco gear. The forces that are applied to this part and the amount of cycles this part will make are both very high. So you need to come up with a lot of surface for it to seat and slide on.
Also the tolerances and wear have to be taken into consideration in a safe way. If you have any play there you're in trouble...and you have to have some play to sync the two weights.

The next mistake is that the lever the weights make on the weak point is going to be pretty big, and the weak areas are small...so there is a chance that the metal will crack, bend or break in the weak area pointed out in the picture below.
Even if the profiles you designed to slide corectly with no torque applied i think the fatigue will break either the weights or the two teeth.




Think about the following statements when you design this:

1. Torque will be applied both clockwise and anti-clockwise on the part, it does not have to jam either way.
2. Sliding surfaces will wear, they have to be small enough to minimise friction but strong and big enough to take the loads applied to them.
3. Weights and their lever make the parts deform with vibrations.
4. Draw the parts in all their positions and judge what loads will they take in that position and think about cycles, and wear when dimensioning the features on the part.

You have to think it up from a dynamic perspective, take in consideration production, precision, vibration, loads, lifetime, assembly, dissasembly and more.
Good luck !
_________________
Supercharger and EFI kits
https://www.the924.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
gegge  



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1124
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about a modified planetry gear train?

The planetary gears are cut in half and the weight and centrifugal force rotate the gear some 90 degrees equivalent to 10 degrees on the internal gear.

Excuse the poor paintjob

_________________
Carl Fredrik Torkildsen

924 turbo -81 Carrera GT RESTOMOD
924 turbo -80 Dolomite De Luxe
924 -85 DP kit, BBS RS, M030 and tuned engine
924s -86 Black on black turbo with Fuchs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeDanger  



Joined: 21 Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Location: Denver

PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will take your feed back of course, however I have taken into account the stresses and and not worried about failure in the places you have pointed out.
There are some other issues I will consider.
I may do something with some elemets from this one:


_________________
It was either this or a giant box of legos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Keefover  



Joined: 15 May 2015
Posts: 4
Location: Long Beach, CA

PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bump

Any progress? I'm interested in manufacturing these devices. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Seems to be some pretty great ideas being kicked around. I have a manufacturer that I work very closely with for other projects that is very excited about undertaking this project.

Jordan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fasteddie313  



Joined: 29 Sep 2013
Posts: 2595
Location: MI

PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keefover wrote:
Bump

Any progress? I'm interested in manufacturing these devices. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Seems to be some pretty great ideas being kicked around. I have a manufacturer that I work very closely with for other projects that is very excited about undertaking this project.

Jordan


See what your doing to me....

http://924board.org/viewtopic.php?p=371972#371972
_________________
80 Turbo - Slightly Modified
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group