| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stv951
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:43 pm Post subject: Building a light 924 - What should my expectations be ? |
|
|
Hello all,
I am interested in lightening my 80s 924.
Will be 5 lug with 931/early 944 arms and brakes. What shoud I expect weight-wise as a reasonable target ?
Anyone who has a light car please pop in. Whats your weight and how did you achieve it ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
9XX Girl!

Joined: 20 Sep 2009 Posts: 1617 Location: Cornish Riviera SW England
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:15 pm Post subject: Re: Building a light 924 - What should my expectations be ? |
|
|
| stv951 wrote: | Hello all,..
... Whats your weight and how did you achieve it ? |
10st 9lb - I don't over eat and I cut and carry my own firewood (by hand, with a bow saw and a Axe)! No wonder i have broken finger nails in winter
Welcome aboard!
Sorry for not being too helpful but i would guess 4 studs are lighter than 5  _________________ 924 (84) N/A 2 ltr - 5 Speed - BLACK - Project (looking for 200BHP, any ideas!)
924 (81) N/A 2 ltr - 3 Speed Auto - SURINAM RED (Metallic) - Near Original Spec (sticking with originality)
BOTH ON THE ROAD, BOTH USED EVERY-OTHER DAY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rich H
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 2665 Location: Preston, Lancs, UK
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ali rear arms would help, I think Bass GT has one of the lightest, IIRC just under a ton. _________________ 1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress...
1980 Porsche 924 S2 DITC Turbo - Original spec
1978 Homo-Sapiens - Tired spec
1953 Landrover S1 - Pensioner Spec |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stv951
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so, only just 1000 kg for a car that weights 1080 in stock form ?
Sound dissapointing
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's tons of info here on weight reduction, most of it is cross-referenced in the stickied Performance Upgrade thread at the top of this section. You should start there.
I don't think 1080 kg is a correct figure. The 931 official curb weight was something like 2500 pounds, give or take a few, which is over 1100 kg. Double check your figures on that one.
Most of the results I've seen indicate that net weight can be reduced somewhere between 200-400 pounds, depending on how radical you go, how much steel you replace with fiberglass or carbon fiber, how much glass you replace with lexan etc. I believe you should be able to achieve right around 1000 kg, but probably not much more. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stv951
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ideola wrote: |
I don't think 1080 kg is a correct figure. The 931 official curb weight was something like 2500 pounds, give or take a few, which is over 1100 kg. Double check your figures on that one.
|
My car is not a 931 it is a 924 (1980), so I guess the 1080 starting point for a basic car is real (no A/C, no sunroof, no electrics) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gegge

Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 1124 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Close to 1000 kg shouldn´t be a problem. But sub 1000 is getting expensive and very time consuming. A 931 can reach 895kg road-leagal and full roll-cage with some effort and the lightest 924 I´ve read about is 70kg down. _________________ Carl Fredrik Torkildsen
924 turbo -81 Carrera GT RESTOMOD
924 turbo -80 Dolomite De Luxe
924 -85 DP kit, BBS RS, M030 and tuned engine
924s -86 Black on black turbo with Fuchs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stv951
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gegge wrote: | | Close to 1000 kg shouldn´t be a problem. But sub 1000 is getting expensive and very time consuming. A 931 can reach 895kg road-leagal and full roll-cage with some effort and the lightest 924 I´ve read about is 70kg down. |
So you know of a 931 at 895 kg and a 924 at about 830 ??? !!!!! NICE !!!!!
Anyone from in here ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gegge

Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 1124 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://utzon.se/gamla/My931/My931.html
He was ridiculus fast in that car, embarrassing modern and tuned 911´s. A shame that the video link doesn´t work any more.
EDIT: I DOES WORK
Stock engine and stock brakes  _________________ Carl Fredrik Torkildsen
924 turbo -81 Carrera GT RESTOMOD
924 turbo -80 Dolomite De Luxe
924 -85 DP kit, BBS RS, M030 and tuned engine
924s -86 Black on black turbo with Fuchs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stv951
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gegge wrote: | http://utzon.se/gamla/My931/My931.html
He was ridiculus fast in that car, embarrassing modern and tuned 911´s. A shame that the video link doesn´t work any more.
EDIT: I DOES WORK
Stock engine and stock brakes  |
I saw the vid. Its amazing how faster he looks compared to this 996... Some good skills... Very light car too |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JayZzzz4

Joined: 23 Sep 2008 Posts: 544 Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I bought my 924S, it was a track car. Only thing in it was the two front seats, motors for the windows and the window visors. Hard to say how fast it is because I haven't been in a 924 before, but I do notice night and day if I have a passenger with me. Feels very light and accelerates fast, even if 5th gear. It's easy to spin your wheel at a stoplight without reeving it up, I haven't tried too much because it's hard on everything, but mostly around turns one wheel will spin if you acc. too much. It shirps into 2nd and I did it once into 3rd. The first time driving it in the rain, I ended up sliding sideways through a roundabout. I think a bunch of people thought I was crazy  _________________ White 1987 Porsche 924S manual |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spec book says 2623lbs. I've always had trouble making that weight even with the roll cage.
I think you can get to 2400lbs pretty quick by essentially removing the interior, dash and all the sound deadening material. After that, you'll need lots of lexan, carbon fiber, fiberglass and ingenuity.
Oh, and a period article on the 924DP cars listed them as being 2138lbs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
simsport

Joined: 06 Nov 2002 Posts: 573 Location: UK Warrington
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:31 am Post subject: light weight |
|
|
I have my sprint car at 980 kilos wet. That still took some work. You can get down to around 900-950 kilos but its not always going to help your speed as much as you think.
Its a well establsihed fact that a 924 can lose more weight from the back than the front hence you may drop your weight but end up slower due to lousy traction.
Dont underestimate the effects of poor traction off the line and out of the tight/slow corners. I have been beaten by a tenth after a sprint over 1.5 miles on a super fast circuit when I was actually quicker everywhere other than the first 60feet!
cheers
simon _________________ Blown is always best! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RC

Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Posts: 2637 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Has the OP actually weighed his car to get a baseline? Forget what the book says it SHOULD be.
The later 924`s got progressively heavier with the extra "features" fitted. My 77 NA street car with manual windows, no sunroof, no emissions, no bitumen sound deadening, no BS, and no spare & jack came in at one metric ton exactly, 1000Kg (whats that = 2200 Lbs?) on a weighbridge with 10 Kg tolerance. Oh no CIS and no stock cast exhaust manifold either.
Now with a supercharger & mounts, pulleys, FMIC, plumbing, amp, more speakers and a bit of fuel it weighs 1050 Kg. Less than 1000Kg should be easily obtainable on a track car even allowing for the roll cage IMHO.
Simsport gives good advice on the rear weight. Even on a street car (with a hoon driving) the difference is very noticeable between carrying a spare with a full tank and not. This is the biggest advantage of the 911 of course. Suspect there is more advantage to relocating the battery to the rear than a polycarbonate (Lexan) hatch, although I haven`t personally done so, yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RC wrote: | | 1000Kg (whats that = 2200 Lbs?) |
Yep, pretty close... 1000Kg = 2204.62256 Lbs, to be exact...
FWIW, the official curb weights are available here, with the earliest and lightest variant from the factory weighing in at 2344 lbs, or 1063Kg. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|