 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, I think he means it's to be located where the plastic grill normally goes in the opening above the chin spoiler. So the IC will be installed in front of the AC condenser and the radiator. The RHS end tank points straight up, and will need an exit hole plumbed near the hood latch. The LHS end tank curls around the condenser / radiator, and requires both to be moved toward the RHS of the car as noted above. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tuurbo

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1446 Location: East Windsor, New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok I think I getcha thanks Dan. Yeah ok. Hmm. _________________ 1980 924 turbo, MSD, Meth. Inj, otherwise stock. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
On stock 931's it would work better if you rotate the intercooler and to have everything opposite.
BTW, the intercooler won't protrude much out of the chin spoiler, but it will be hard to use the stock plastic grille. I plan using something better anyway because I don't like the idea of getting some stones in the core. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shurick

Joined: 15 May 2005 Posts: 524 Location: Russia, Moscow.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
We're just fitting an Mitsubishi EVO VIII IC into my 931. I hope I'll be able to take some pictures later this weekend. The idea is to move the rad backwards and fit a blow-through fan in front of IC and rad. _________________ WBR, Shurick
'79 931 -- intercooled K26-3060-6.10 turbo @ 1.2 bar, EFI+EDIS, 951S brakes, stripped interior, 951 look.
'86 924S -- R.I.P.
https://www.instagram.com/ru_pacecar/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, installed the modified 951 intercooler to the car today.
Since the head is still in machine shop I couldn't start the car yet, but you'll get the idea.
Here it is on the brick for test and measurements:
Already installed and behind the cooling rad that was moved 40mm's to the passenger side. Note that hole for the intercooler outlet is not yet drilled.
Front view:
And just for reference, the engine:
 _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Last edited by Raceboy on Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not to squelch the creativity (because this definitely looks easier than removing the badge panel), but I'd be concerned about putting the 5"-thick 951 FMIC in front of the rad...and I also assume that this requires removal of the A/C condenser...
Otherwise, it's a very cool idea (pardon the pun)... _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
99% of the Euro 924's don't have AC.
And I left 60mm space between front cross-bar and IC, additionally there's a gap between IC and rad. That eliminates any cooling issues both on IC and rad.
Remember, all heat echangers (intercoolers, rads, oil coolers etc) work better with having low pressure behind it than high pressure in front of it
Important is to have just about enough room in front for the air flow to get to rad, it doesn't have to ram it. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Except that the air it's getting is now preheated by the intercooler. I think this is of particular concern because the IC is 5" thick, unlike the thin 1" or less condenser typically stacked in front of a rad. Your air flow is going to be MUCH less coming out of that FMIC than a condener, and it's going to be much hotter than ambient (if it's doing it's job).
The other important factor for heat exchangers is temp differential between the mediums, and preheating the air that's supposed to cool your coolant is not a good idea. The other concern on this location as well is that you've essentially blocked the most open area to ram air that the radiator gets. Above that opening is bumper and badge panel, so unless you intend to open up some airflow through the baffling behind the badge panel, your rad is going to get significantly less airflow than it was designed for.
The other problem I see is that I think 60mm is too large of a gap. If you look at most stacked heat exchangers on production cars, they are almost always an inch or less apart. From what I've read and discussed elsewhere, more than an inch or so tends to cause turbulence coming out of the front heat exchanger, and the air doesn't want to go thru the second exchanger. OTOH, too little distance and there's too much resistance, so the air is like hitting a brick wall and would rather go around than through. I would try to get them closer together, like an inch apart.
Don't get me wrong...I'm not "dissing" your design...but there are some considerations that have to be addressed before stacking exchangers like this. It will be very interesting to see what type of performance you get from your cooling system when you get the car on the road. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are missing my point here, Dan.
60mm gap is between 951 IC and cross-member that connects main rails. It means that cool air will get to rad bypassing the intercooler.
There's a 40mm gap between IC and rad.
Besides, I can throw some logs that shows CLT and IAT during runs and perhaps on the track also when done, it shows that this is enough for modest power levels of this car.
BTW, have you seen cooling system of 20v turbo Audis? These have rad inside the engine compartment and without any significant airflow to them. There's aux rad in front but many builders remove it but these cars doesn't overheat anyway. It's much worse solution than mine, yet works successfully even on 600+hp cars. Not for 24h races obviously, but for fast street car it's more than enough. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice work raceboy, sometimes we just need to remember that if we sit around nitpicking the details, we won't ever end up getting things done(I've got a few projects laying around because of that problem). I would be very interested in seeing your datalogs when your motor is back together.
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Raceboy...ah, OK, understood regarding the 60mm...but I think 40mm is still not optimum (i.e. too far apart). Bear in mind, I'm simply basing that on my own observations plus the conversations I've had with guys in my town that are doing intercooler installs on supercharged modern vehicles...may not be applicable, but it's worth noting.
My comments are general observations, since I don't know the power levels you're planning for this car, nor its intended usage. I tend to look at things from an "optimum / maximum" design perspective, rather than a "just enough" design perspective. Sometimes to my detriment, I will admit. You may be right that this will work fine for a modestly boosted street car.
I don't mean to nitpick or squelch innovation (I think I said that already, but it probably bears repeating). Please share the results once you're able to get some track time and data logs. It will be very interesting to see. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doing my best, I'm building three 924's right now (white, this red and Gulf), plus I stepped into the dark side of Porsche ownership and acquired a 911
It's 1978 Euro Carrera roller and 1970 2.2S engine, taken apart and waiting for rebuild. Will be lightweight fun car.
I wouldn't have bought it, but I got it for free. Well, almost, I had to do electrics in friends 1967 911 RSR replica racecar, so no money involved, just time. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
FWIW, badge panel is easy to remove. However, transplanting a 951 rad/IC mount to accomodate the plumbing is another story.
2.2 rebuild? Better start saving up your pennies. _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rasta Monsta wrote: |
2.2 rebuild? Better start saving up your pennies. |
Where have you been living? Full rebuild kit from Vertex costs 949usd and consists of everything (gaskets, o-rings, bearings, rings, rod bolts, sealants etc) for rebuild. It assumes that pistons and cylinders are in tact (which they are now, I bought one used cylinder) and engine requires just regular machining work (head job, machining surfaces etc).
I'm doind magnesium case specialty stuff myself like installing case-savers, shuffle-pinning and oil pump bypass mod and twin-plugging. After that I have the case line bored and total will be around 1700-1800 usd including machine work.
Engine parts (gaskets, bearings, rings) cost much less for 911 than for 944 for example. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Last edited by Raceboy on Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome, man, enjoy! _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|