Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Intercoolers for 931's any one want one?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, I think he means it's to be located where the plastic grill normally goes in the opening above the chin spoiler. So the IC will be installed in front of the AC condenser and the radiator. The RHS end tank points straight up, and will need an exit hole plumbed near the hood latch. The LHS end tank curls around the condenser / radiator, and requires both to be moved toward the RHS of the car as noted above.
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tuurbo  



Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 1446
Location: East Windsor, New Jersey

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok I think I getcha thanks Dan. Yeah ok. Hmm.
_________________
1980 924 turbo, MSD, Meth. Inj, otherwise stock.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On stock 931's it would work better if you rotate the intercooler and to have everything opposite.
BTW, the intercooler won't protrude much out of the chin spoiler, but it will be hard to use the stock plastic grille. I plan using something better anyway because I don't like the idea of getting some stones in the core.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Shurick  



Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 524
Location: Russia, Moscow.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We're just fitting an Mitsubishi EVO VIII IC into my 931. I hope I'll be able to take some pictures later this weekend. The idea is to move the rad backwards and fit a blow-through fan in front of IC and rad.
_________________
WBR, Shurick
'79 931 -- intercooled K26-3060-6.10 turbo @ 1.2 bar, EFI+EDIS, 951S brakes, stripped interior, 951 look.
'86 924S -- R.I.P.
https://www.instagram.com/ru_pacecar/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, installed the modified 951 intercooler to the car today.

Since the head is still in machine shop I couldn't start the car yet, but you'll get the idea.

Here it is on the brick for test and measurements:


Already installed and behind the cooling rad that was moved 40mm's to the passenger side. Note that hole for the intercooler outlet is not yet drilled.


Front view:


And just for reference, the engine:

_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche


Last edited by Raceboy on Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not to squelch the creativity (because this definitely looks easier than removing the badge panel), but I'd be concerned about putting the 5"-thick 951 FMIC in front of the rad...and I also assume that this requires removal of the A/C condenser...

Otherwise, it's a very cool idea (pardon the pun)...
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

99% of the Euro 924's don't have AC.

And I left 60mm space between front cross-bar and IC, additionally there's a gap between IC and rad. That eliminates any cooling issues both on IC and rad.
Remember, all heat echangers (intercoolers, rads, oil coolers etc) work better with having low pressure behind it than high pressure in front of it
Important is to have just about enough room in front for the air flow to get to rad, it doesn't have to ram it.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Except that the air it's getting is now preheated by the intercooler. I think this is of particular concern because the IC is 5" thick, unlike the thin 1" or less condenser typically stacked in front of a rad. Your air flow is going to be MUCH less coming out of that FMIC than a condener, and it's going to be much hotter than ambient (if it's doing it's job).

The other important factor for heat exchangers is temp differential between the mediums, and preheating the air that's supposed to cool your coolant is not a good idea. The other concern on this location as well is that you've essentially blocked the most open area to ram air that the radiator gets. Above that opening is bumper and badge panel, so unless you intend to open up some airflow through the baffling behind the badge panel, your rad is going to get significantly less airflow than it was designed for.

The other problem I see is that I think 60mm is too large of a gap. If you look at most stacked heat exchangers on production cars, they are almost always an inch or less apart. From what I've read and discussed elsewhere, more than an inch or so tends to cause turbulence coming out of the front heat exchanger, and the air doesn't want to go thru the second exchanger. OTOH, too little distance and there's too much resistance, so the air is like hitting a brick wall and would rather go around than through. I would try to get them closer together, like an inch apart.

Don't get me wrong...I'm not "dissing" your design...but there are some considerations that have to be addressed before stacking exchangers like this. It will be very interesting to see what type of performance you get from your cooling system when you get the car on the road.
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are missing my point here, Dan.

60mm gap is between 951 IC and cross-member that connects main rails. It means that cool air will get to rad bypassing the intercooler.

There's a 40mm gap between IC and rad.

Besides, I can throw some logs that shows CLT and IAT during runs and perhaps on the track also when done, it shows that this is enough for modest power levels of this car.

BTW, have you seen cooling system of 20v turbo Audis? These have rad inside the engine compartment and without any significant airflow to them. There's aux rad in front but many builders remove it but these cars doesn't overheat anyway. It's much worse solution than mine, yet works successfully even on 600+hp cars. Not for 24h races obviously, but for fast street car it's more than enough.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice work raceboy, sometimes we just need to remember that if we sit around nitpicking the details, we won't ever end up getting things done(I've got a few projects laying around because of that problem). I would be very interested in seeing your datalogs when your motor is back together.

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raceboy...ah, OK, understood regarding the 60mm...but I think 40mm is still not optimum (i.e. too far apart). Bear in mind, I'm simply basing that on my own observations plus the conversations I've had with guys in my town that are doing intercooler installs on supercharged modern vehicles...may not be applicable, but it's worth noting.

My comments are general observations, since I don't know the power levels you're planning for this car, nor its intended usage. I tend to look at things from an "optimum / maximum" design perspective, rather than a "just enough" design perspective. Sometimes to my detriment, I will admit. You may be right that this will work fine for a modestly boosted street car.

I don't mean to nitpick or squelch innovation (I think I said that already, but it probably bears repeating). Please share the results once you're able to get some track time and data logs. It will be very interesting to see.
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doing my best, I'm building three 924's right now (white, this red and Gulf), plus I stepped into the dark side of Porsche ownership and acquired a 911
It's 1978 Euro Carrera roller and 1970 2.2S engine, taken apart and waiting for rebuild. Will be lightweight fun car.
I wouldn't have bought it, but I got it for free. Well, almost, I had to do electrics in friends 1967 911 RSR replica racecar, so no money involved, just time.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FWIW, badge panel is easy to remove. However, transplanting a 951 rad/IC mount to accomodate the plumbing is another story.

2.2 rebuild? Better start saving up your pennies.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:

2.2 rebuild? Better start saving up your pennies.


Where have you been living? Full rebuild kit from Vertex costs 949usd and consists of everything (gaskets, o-rings, bearings, rings, rod bolts, sealants etc) for rebuild. It assumes that pistons and cylinders are in tact (which they are now, I bought one used cylinder) and engine requires just regular machining work (head job, machining surfaces etc).
I'm doind magnesium case specialty stuff myself like installing case-savers, shuffle-pinning and oil pump bypass mod and twin-plugging. After that I have the case line bored and total will be around 1700-1800 usd including machine work.
Engine parts (gaskets, bearings, rings) cost much less for 911 than for 944 for example.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche


Last edited by Raceboy on Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Awesome, man, enjoy!
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group