 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Martijnus

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 2019 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:47 am Post subject: Dry sump & oil sprayers |
|
|
I'm not saying I'm actually gonna do this, but it crossed my mind because I've seen dry sump on my motorbikes and other stuff and it's just great.
A friend of mine had oil sprayers installed in his opel engine and I read this thread: http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=22933
where oil sprayers are mentioned too.
If I should realize my turbo plans combined with LPG injection, oil sprayers would be a great thing.
The dry sump has some advantages. You can have MORE oil in your tank. The extra weight is a downside, but more oil means the heat can be given to more volume, and the same with pollution.
Another advantage is the absence of an oil bath in the oil pan, during cornering could mean surging or other negative effects internally.
No oil in the pan also means less resistance for the crank..
The most interesting option for dry sump is the adaptation of the oil pan.
But when I think of it, this isnīt really possible
Because the oil pan can be lower, the engine can sit lower overall, which should improve handling bigtime!
But when I think of it, thereīs not that much oil pan to be removed, except for the part where the oil pickup is. The crossmember probably is the problem.
Anyway, I read in the mentioned topic that bassgt planned to go dry sump, so Iīm interested if he can tell me more.
Whatīs the best way to do dry sump on our engines? Use an external belt driven pump for getting the oil back from the pan to the oil tank?
Oil sprayers? Anyone has seen it on our engines? I know there's a oil gallery through the whole block, so that could be used to fit those things.
I'm not interested in why I shouldn't use dry sump, only how it should be done  _________________ "Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)
924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steve Bassington is using a bolt-on dry sump set up from Pace Products. If I can spring for it, this is the setup I'd like to run.
Re: oil sprayers, here is a good read with cross references:
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=23286 _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bass gt

Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 971 Location: Johannesburg for now!!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dry sumping out engines is very easy. Not cheap, but very easy.
The standard sump needs to be machined. Basically, if you take the sump and sit it on a flat surface, you need to machine the sump down parallel to the block mating face just at the point where the sump pan meets the shallow section that sits over the crossmember. Do not machhine this shallow section, only the sump pan that hangs below it. The machined section now needs a bottom fabricating, with both a trough to take the pickup pipes, and baffles to direct the oil flow. 2x -12 JIC is fine. Front & back of the new area is best.
Now strip down the stock oil pump, and remove the toothed gear wheel. This will stop the stock pump making pressure.
Fit the PACE dry sump pump i had them make, and all ancilliary pipe work and oil tank.
Finally, seal all vents and such in the block. The pump will create considerable vacuum in the block, which is a good thing. Having air leaks is not.
Enjoy the significant HP benefits. Dont count the money or time it's cost you
And sadly, because of the limitations of the crossmember, you cannot lower the engine, so no gain there
Steve _________________ Front Wheel Drive is the Devil's work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash16
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 255 Location: Cali Cali
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
perhaps you can consider a crank scraper to counteract the windage. May not be as good as a dry sump, but it will be cost effective. _________________ 1987 Porsche 924S Black/Black. 5-spd.
Options: AFX C79 261 398 423 650 651 657
1987 Mercedes 190E 2.3-16 Cosworth Pearl Black/Black. 5-spd.
STUTTGART PREVAILS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dash16 wrote: | | perhaps you can consider a crank scraper to counteract the windage. May not be as good as a dry sump, but it will be cost effective. |
Yes, in addition to that, I believe a viable, lower-cost alternative is also the Canton Accusump approach (Vaughan is using an accusump and an I-J crank scraper in his ITB NA car), or also a crank case vacuum pump by GZ Motorsports. More details here.
My preference for the UWB is dry sump, just not sure if I can swing the $2K price tag in the time frame I want to have the car completed. My current "backup" plan if the dry sump doesn't work out is to run the new twin-scraper from I-J, along with a 3-qt accusump. This setup will cost roughly a third of the dry sump. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martijnus

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 2019 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
So if I understand it correctly, the stock oil pump isn't used, and the PACE pump feeds the oil in the engine through the stock pickup pipe and through the stock oil pump channels (keeping the pressure valve intact)?
Why shouldn't I modify the shallow section of the oil pan? Is it because it's already too close to the crankshaft/con rods caps or is there another reason?
I assume the PACE pump is apparently a dual pump? One for pan-to-tank which creates the crank vacuum too, and one to feed oil from tank-to-engine.
Besides the mods to the pan and vents, there aren't any other modifications needed? (I couldn't think of anything).
The oil pressure is still 'regulated'/limited by the stock pump housing?
I wonder if there isn't a cheaper way than buying a pace pump.
Oil isn't the thing I want to do in a risky manner, but with the right parts, skills and creativity it should be possible to build another system.
As long as my pressure gauge reads the same values, I can be confident that the engine gets its lubrication right.
Oil sprayers probably have big influence on the pressure (however, the pressure limiter in the pump should compensate unless the oil flow is maxed out already).
I'll see if I can find some info on the specs of dry sump pumps and systems. Since the pace pump apparently pumps air too, not every pump will be suitable.
I wonder what happens if you'd maintain the stock pump for oil feed and just add a pump which sucks the oil out of the pan to the oil tank. only problem is that the capacity of that pump needs to be greater than the capacaty of the stock pump. In any case the return pump should always have bigger capacity.
Edit: To be clear, by the oil squirters I meant squirters in the engine block, not on the con rods. _________________ "Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)
924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment
Last edited by Martijnus on Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rich H
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 2665 Location: Preston, Lancs, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Watches with interest.... _________________ 1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress...
1980 Porsche 924 S2 DITC Turbo - Original spec
1978 Homo-Sapiens - Tired spec
1953 Landrover S1 - Pensioner Spec |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've looked at dozens of suppliers of dry sump setups, and priced out multiple configurations. By the time you source all of the parts and do the custom fabrication and guess work on getting the crank and pump pulleys sorted, there is no way you can touch the price of the Pace setup, and that is even at a 1.5x multiplier on USD to GBP. From everything I've seen the Pace setup is not only the least expensive path to dry sumping a 924, it has the added benefit of being completely bolt on. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lizard

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 9364 Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dan,
I would not recommend buying the IJ scraper.
I purchased one for my 928 (stock 5.0L bottom) and was quoted 4-6 weeks for delivery.
After 4+ months and numerous emails asking status and NONE of them being returned. I posted on rennlist.
THAT night he responded to my latest email. Saying he would be shipping it right away. He didnt, and he didnt send it priority overnight or offer a partial discount or refund for the length of time waited for the product.
All told it was over 5 months before I saw the product. Cost was $550 + shipping.
Then after getting it. The piece is something which any DIYer could build with some sheet metal plasma cutter (or equal) and a small welder for a FRACTION of the cost. I mean maybe $50 in materials.
So save your money on that, and put it towards the drysump.
As to the price of the Pace unit, it is a very reasonable price instead of building it yourself which the average person would not have the tools to do. _________________ 3 928s, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9075 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah - I got my crankscraper from IJ virtually instantly... but others, including Chris Marsh, have had pretty bad wait times etc for theirs...
OTOH, the product quality is great, no complaints there, both mine and the other one I installed (a teflon sandwich style in a 944 S2). _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lizard

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 9364 Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vaughan,
The quality of mine appears to be OK.
However I havent installed it onto the engine yet and I have heard a couple of horror stories from other 928 guys that he had to redo them because the holes were all way off
I am actually kinda nervous about it.
if you order from him, you will get the product. But the question is how long, and what will you have to do to get him to respond? _________________ 3 928s, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bass gt

Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 971 Location: Johannesburg for now!!
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Martijnus wrote: | So if I understand it correctly, the stock oil pump isn't used, and the PACE pump feeds the oil in the engine through the stock pickup pipe and through the stock oil pump channels (keeping the pressure valve intact)?
No. The pump feeds the oil into the engine via an adaptor plate which goes where the OE filter attaches under the exhaust manifold. You run a seperate oil filter unit. When you take the sump off, you also remove the stock oil pickup. You don't need to blank it off where it attached to the block by the main cap, as you feed the oil into the centre port of the filter port on the block, which feeds oil into the gallery, and not to the stock pump. If you have an old block available, have a look at the oil galleries, and it becomes obvious
Basically, the stock pump sucks oil from the sump, it goes through the pump to the oil filter. It comes out of the block via the outer "ear" shaped orrifice, through the filter, and back into the oil gallery through the centre port on the filter. So by feeding oil directly into this centre port, you are bypassing the OE pump suction and feed sides. The main bearings and all oil galleries are fed from the post oil filter side of the oil path, so you loose nothing
Why shouldn't I modify the shallow section of the oil pan? Is it because it's already too close to the crankshaft/con rods caps or is there another reason?
Because firstly, the front section of the sump has very nice oil fins which direct the oil to the pan. Secondly, the sump is too shallow to machine, re weld a base AND centre channel into, and retain the clearance to the cross member. Also, have a look on the rear of the sump, and you have the drain plug, and another bolt above it. By machining away just below the higher bolt, you still retain a drain plug, as although the majority of the oil is stored in the tank, some will always drain down from the engine into the sump, so helps oil changes
I assume the PACE pump is apparently a dual pump? One for pan-to-tank which creates the crank vacuum too, and one to feed oil from tank-to-engine.
No, the normal PACE pump is a 3 stage pump. 2 suction stages, and 1 pump stage. However, PACE will add as many stages as required, but 2&1 is fine.
Basically, the 2 suction stages pull the oil from the sump, and combine to a single feed to the tank. The feed from the tank goes to the pump, out the pump under pressure, through the filter unit and into the engine
Besides the mods to the pan and vents, there aren't any other modifications needed? (I couldn't think of anything).
Yes there are!! Seal all the holes in the block & head. Weld the oil filler aperture and fit a -10JIC fitting, and 1 way valve to the head with the other eend going to the oil tank.
Also, you need to get a second stock bottom cam pully. This needs to be mounted on the normal pulley to drive the oil pump.
Also, it is advisable to rebuild your motor, especially rings and engine seals. This will really help the motor perform, as the vacuum in the sump aids ring seating, and old, worn rings will suffer massive blow by.
You also need the adaptor to fit the feed pipe from the standalone filrt housing to the block and lots of -12 and -10 braided hose and lots of JIC/AN fittings.
The oil pressure is still 'regulated'/limited by the stock pump housing?
No, the oil pressure is now regulated by the new filter unit. There is an aduster screw, so you warm the oil up, and set the pressure accordingly. The stock pump now serves no purpose other than to hold the front oil seal
I wonder if there isn't a cheaper way than buying a pace pump.
Oil isn't the thing I want to do in a risky manner, but with the right parts, skills and creativity it should be possible to build another system.
Good luck.
As long as my pressure gauge reads the same values, I can be confident that the engine gets its lubrication right.
Yes, if your oil pressure sensor is in the back of the head, there is no change. I'm running multiple sensors, such as at the filter, in the head, gallery ect.
Oil sprayers probably have big influence on the pressure (however, the pressure limiter in the pump should compensate unless the oil flow is maxed out already).
Tust me, you can wind the pressure up on the Pace system to silly levels. However, this will just wreck the bearings in short order. As the stock crank has oil sprays through the bearings onto the piston bottoms, why add more? No need!!
I'll see if I can find some info on the specs of dry sump pumps and systems. Since the pace pump apparently pumps air too, not every pump will be suitable.
What are you talking about?? the pump is meant to pump oil AND air, hence the vacuum in the block, which is a VERY GOOD THING
I wonder what happens if you'd maintain the stock pump for oil feed and just add a pump which sucks the oil out of the pan to the oil tank. only problem is that the capacity of that pump needs to be greater than the capacaty of the stock pump. In any case the return pump should always have bigger capacity.
Don't be silly. Please rethink this comment. Have a look at the stock oil path in the block and you will quickly realise this is a non starter. And what benefit would this give?
Edit: To be clear, by the oil squirters I meant squirters in the engine block, not on the con rods. |
And for reference, i'm not planning to dry sump my engine. I HAVE dry sumped it, so this is all facts, not assumptions. It makes a HUGE difference to the performance, even on an N/A i would suspect it could be worth 10-20BHP due to less pumping losses and engine efficiency. And the engine spins up much better, partly due to lower resistance from having no oil for the crank to splosh through, and partly because of the vacuum produced, which gives the pistons less pumping resistance. Go to the PACE website, there is a ton of info there.
By way of example, i have friends who race formula fords here in the UK. One trick is to put a kettle element into the oil tank to pre heat the oil, as dry sump systems typically run cooler. This gives them about 3-5 bhp straight away, rather than having to waut for the oil to warm up in a race.
Finally, whilst a crank scraper and Accusump are good ways of limiting windage and surge/pressure fluctuations, they are no substitute for a true dry sump system. With the dry sump, you get very real performance benefits, in both additional power, better oil pressures under all circumstances, and also better thermal management. With dry sump systems, it is not ofter necessary to use any oil cooler, as the larger oil capacity disperses heat better, and with the oil not being in the engine, the water temp is more stable. You actually find that the oil and water temp are very even. Coolers may be required for warmer climates, or prolonged racing but they wil not be as big as you would think. For example, i could not get my oil above 90 deg, and thats without a cooler!!
Also, with the oil being setted in the tank, there is no aeration of the oil, which happens in the sump. So you are always pumping oil, not oil/air around the engine. And as such, this keeps the engine cooler, as the air absorbs heat better than oil, and in turn heats the oil up. Vicious cycle. Personally speaking, i think it is one of the most under acknowleged yet fundamental performance enhancing mods out there. Not the cheapest, but if you get +15-20 hp, better thermal management, better longvevity on the engine, it's a no brainer
Steve _________________ Front Wheel Drive is the Devil's work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martijnus

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 2019 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks steve, you've made it all clear
About that pump... I meant if I would look for an alternative pump instead of the pace pump, it must be able to pump air too. And as far as I know not every oil pump likes to pump air. I guess you thought I meant that the pace pump can't pump air...?
15-20 HP is more than 10% on a NA engine (and even 931).
That would mean that roughly I have 10% more power to keep the engine running, so that would mean I need less hp for normal driving...which improves engine efficiency a lot.
The reason you'd have more top end HP can only be less internal resistance...right?
I like that
edit: at the moment my oil temp goes to 80deg C and my water doesn't get above 80, 90 in heavy traffic. I'm told that indeed these temperatures should be about equal for the least stress in the engine. _________________ "Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)
924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bass gt

Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 971 Location: Johannesburg for now!!
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Martijnus,
No probs. The problem you may encounter is not finding a suitable pump, but mounting it. The PACE unit is specially machined t bolt straight on, and using a second bottom crank pulley, the belt will be at the ideal tension.
Regarding the air pump issue, the PACE has 2 scavenge pumps vs 1 pressure pump. So thescavenge side will always out perform the pressure side, which is how it generates the vacuum.
However, despite the relatively cheap price now that the Euro & Ģ parity there is a lot of additional bits required, so this is never a cheap mod, but well worth it in my opinion
Steve _________________ Front Wheel Drive is the Devil's work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joes924Racer

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 11964 Location: Oregon, Denver Colorado native!
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Should runa few degrees cooler and if ya get a nice cooler well then shit itll run alot cooler and thats on top of the other advantages of goin dry sump with a pump _________________ 1979 porsche 924 Na
1980 porsche Turbo 931GT Replica
Have u ever driven a turbo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|