Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Leaf Blower Air Intake?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TheFuzz89  



Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 50
Location: Grand Rapids, MI 49316

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:15 pm    Post subject: Leaf Blower Air Intake? Reply with quote

Haha... this sounded ridiculous at first, but when thinking about it, it might work

A buddy of mine was telling me yesterday he saw an article about someone who mounted an electric leaf blower to their air intake and saw significant power increases. They ran the dyno and got almost an extra 50 hp (supposidly). I believe he sad it was on like a late 80's model Mustang.

I tried a seach for it and came up with a few other forums but no solid info.

Has anyone else heard of this, or any other similar, cheap ways to "supercharge" a car?

... Humor me
_________________
1977 Porsche 924
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Khal  



Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 4872
Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about...

...this?

And this?

Or this?


Or you could just try NOS... (and searching)
_________________
'80 924 Turbo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JB 924  



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 606
Location: Hessen, Germany

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually bought these plans a while back when I thought tuned Japanese cars were cool.

http://www.horsepowermods.com/

Some say that it might recstrict airflow.

I saw a car on cardomain once. I think it was a Cirtoen, and the guy put 2 electric superchargers on it, and supposedly went from 0- 60 in 14 seconds, down to 7. Kind of an expensive experiment, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keaton  



Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 261
Location: 85202

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JB 924 wrote:
I actually bought these plans a while back when I thought tuned Japanese cars were cool.

hey can you email me the plans if you still have them, i think it would be funn to toy with it, my 91 jetta has around 350,000 mi and its on its way out, this might help it along
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
moone924  



Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Posts: 868
Location: Douglas Wyoming

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can hook the shroud to heater box tubes on a air-cooled VW to the carburetor and pick up 10HP on a stock engine. Not a good idea though as the stock Solex can't handle forced induction without being o-ringed. Not that this has anything to do with the 924.
_________________
Ryan Moone

Always shopping for a nice s2 931 to baby.
New philosophy : one car project at a time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
TheFuzz89  



Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 50
Location: Grand Rapids, MI 49316

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

so in theory it could work? but do to alternator restrictions and not enough power... its just a waste of time and money

thanks again khal
_________________
1977 Porsche 924
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
JB 924  



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 606
Location: Hessen, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keaton, I still got those plans. I'll send them to you, just give me a while to find them. Not sure where I got them. Tell me if it worked!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
macBdog  



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 1111
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think leaf blowers and electric superchargers are a Bad Idea. Here are my reasons:

1) The forced induction will only be operating for a short period of time. If its good (unlikely), youll want to run it all the time leading you to a proper method of forced induction ie turbo or supercharging.... or both!

2) Most "electric RAM air supercharger" type of things sell themselves on CFM of airflow. Which has almost nothing to do with boost pressure. Do the numbers on the energy required to compress air and you will see that a proper electric supercharger requires multiple batteries and large beefy motors to work effectivly.

3) If you have to go to the trouble of mounting extra batteries and large electric motors in your car, why not just bolt on a turbo? Some would argue its free power because you are harnessing your exhaust gasses. If you don't like turbo charging because of the lag then get a supercharger. If you are worried about losing horses from driving the supercharger then turn up the boost or GTFO!

Don't get me wrong, experimentation is great but if you are fitting one to make your car faster, its a waste of time.
_________________
1979 931 with a 350 chev
1973 911E with EFI
p-talk wrote:
I'm still convinced the word 'Porsche' makes people crazy in all kinds of ways
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stampedetrail  



Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 274
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

macBdog wrote:
I think leaf blowers and electric superchargers are a Bad Idea. Here are my reasons:

1) The forced induction will only be operating for a short period of time. If its good (unlikely), youll want to run it all the time leading you to a proper method of forced induction ie turbo or supercharging.... or both!

2) Most "electric RAM air supercharger" type of things sell themselves on CFM of airflow. Which has almost nothing to do with boost pressure. Do the numbers on the energy required to compress air and you will see that a proper electric supercharger requires multiple batteries and large beefy motors to work effectivly.

Not to jump on this bandwagon, but I couldn't help but wondering what about storing air in a tank, and letting it go at the proper time to create boost for a brief period?
_________________
1977.5 924 "Martini" head / New Old Stock rebuild
1985.5 944 Why? Because I can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Khal  



Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 4872
Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stampedetrail wrote:
...what about storing air in a tank, and letting it go at the proper time to create boost for a brief period?


Why not just use NOS?
_________________
'80 924 Turbo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JSilverman  



Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 93
Location: Burke, VA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Khal wrote:


Why not just use NOS?
Why not use both?

http://videos.streetfire.net/Player.aspx?fileid=AB544E3B-5DFF-416D-9CFD-A1AD23CA9564&p=0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
macBdog  



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 1111
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stampedetrail wrote:
Not to jump on this bandwagon, but I couldn't help but wondering what about storing air in a tank, and letting it go at the proper time to create boost for a brief period?


This would work. But what happens if a second person wants to drag race you at the traffic lights? You'll have to pull into a service station and pump up your air tank. Plus you won't be able to run a suitable cam because your car will only be on boost in the high rev range SOME of the time. Youd also have to turn fuel enrichment on and off depending on if you were running the compressed air. You could run a solenoid off the air tank to a relay to trigger your second cam profile vtec style and tell your computer to run a richer profile.
_________________
1979 931 with a 350 chev
1973 911E with EFI
p-talk wrote:
I'm still convinced the word 'Porsche' makes people crazy in all kinds of ways
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Khal  



Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 4872
Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

macBdog wrote:
This would work.


Really? I wouldn't have thought so.

I'm also a little skeptical of that leaf blower video... I would've thought the engine could suck more air at full rev's than the leaf blower could put out?
_________________
'80 924 Turbo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stampedetrail  



Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 274
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

macBdog wrote:
Stampedetrail wrote:
Not to jump on this bandwagon, but I couldn't help but wondering what about storing air in a tank, and letting it go at the proper time to create boost for a brief period?


This would work. But what happens if a second person wants to drag race you at the traffic lights? You'll have to pull into a service station and pump up your air tank. Plus you won't be able to run a suitable cam because your car will only be on boost in the high rev range SOME of the time. Youd also have to turn fuel enrichment on and off depending on if you were running the compressed air. You could run a solenoid off the air tank to a relay to trigger your second cam profile vtec style and tell your computer to run a richer profile.

I don't think you'd necessarily need a service station to create high pressures in a tank, just run an intermittant air pump off the electrical system or belt drive. There's already an "air pump" in the system; so long as it doesn't pump up the tank all the time (robbing power @ high pressure obviously) i.e. an off switch or some kind of pressure controlled diverter valve, maybe.
The mixture part of the problem is very difficult, but there's already a setup for enriching the mixture (CSV & TTS) so perhaps it could be accomplished by controlling the CSV?
Quote:
Why not just use NOS?

I don't like NOS.
_________________
1977.5 924 "Martini" head / New Old Stock rebuild
1985.5 944 Why? Because I can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
macBdog  



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 1111
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Khal wrote:
Really? I wouldn't have thought so.


Take a look at the compressor figures for the stock 931 turbo, you can compare them to a shop air compressor. Thing is that air compressors store way more air pressure in the tank than is required but let it out of the tank at a slower rate. So a turbo will flow ~200CFM @ 1.0 bar whereas an airtank will flow 10CFM @ 10 bar. You would need a large air tank and a high flow regulator to get the required flow and pressure from an air tank for a SHORT period of time. It would be alot like NOS, hit a switch, get some boost then go refill again. Except you can store alot more nitrous in the tank because of the liquid -> gas conversion.

Stampedetrail wrote:
There's already an "air pump" in the system; so long as it doesn't pump up the tank all the time (robbing power @ high pressure obviously) i.e. an off switch or some kind of pressure controlled diverter valve, maybe.


The air pump in the 924 NA hasnt nearly enough balls to compress air into a tank. Ever tried pumping up a truck tyre with a bike pump? Neither have I but apparantly all that happens is the pump gets hot, the seals blow and you get a sore arm. Basically any air pump that has enough balls to compress enough air will require a ballsy energy source. Actually.. heres what could work - drive an air compressor off the crank. Hmm but youd have to have some system for bleeding off air because it would increase its output at WOT and overfill your air tank. Why not feed the output of the compressor directly into the engine and bleed off excess air... this sounds like a great idea.

Stampedetrail wrote:
I don't like NOS.


The more you think about a cheap and easy method of increasing your performance, the more you will like NOS. Its dangerous yea but so is any kind of performance upgrade where you can just "turn it up dude!".
_________________
1979 931 with a 350 chev
1973 911E with EFI
p-talk wrote:
I'm still convinced the word 'Porsche' makes people crazy in all kinds of ways
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group