Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Easy EFI....
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:
He's not gonna "destroy" an NA by running a 1.8 Golf Motronic on it.


Actually, its entirely possible that he could destroy it. Its just a matter of how long it will take. Will it just explode suddenly? probably not. However severe detonation damage is a definite possibility. Which as you know includes piston damage, thrashes bearings, etc.

Which is why I asked how it was being tuned. I assumed it was being tuned in some manner or another. If it was just slapped on without consideration of the significant motor behavior differences, well ... I wish you luck on that.

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
RC  



Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 2637
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Min wrote:
My biggest question is how do you tune it? ...

Min

Thank you Min.

Reading through his thread, I too wondered when, if ever at all, this question would arise.

Now its finally been raised ... where is the sitting back eating popcorn smiley???
_________________
World`s quickest 924 2L slushbox

Allan @ DTA wrote:
I have no issue with superchargers, they are for guys who want to drive a car rather than talk about horsepower with their baseball cap on backwards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goodness, how did all those cars survive all those years with only carburetors?


_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:
Goodness, how did all those cars survive all those years with only carburetors?


That's pretty simple to answer. Carbs are tunable in a variety of ways. You don't simply install a carb from one car onto another and expect it to simply work. You set it up. Just like EFI. You know carb tuning is considered a black art by some right? There are multiple jets inside you can change, screws for fuel trimming, etc.

RC: considered raising it awhile ago, but figured I'd let this thread go for a bit without commenting.

The entire purpose of switching to a EFI solution is to enjoy the additional control that it gives you(well, there are alot more benefits also). If the original poster is using some method to trim the fuel tables etc, then awesome, sounds like a nice cheap workable solution.(though not alot of actual details are provided about what components he installed, or any real install details at all) If not, this sort of conversion is dangerous. I would strongly recommend additional monitoring to ensure the motor is running safely throughout its operating range.

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Martijnus  



Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 2019
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

so just put in a wideband and see if it's running extremely lean or rich. If not, it will be fine.

Stupid Kjet is also off 90% of the time so chances are everyone is ruining their engine anyways with the standard fuel system.
_________________
"Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)

924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Min wrote:
The entire purpose of switching to a EFI solution is to enjoy the additional control that it gives you


Or, perhaps OP's purpose was to pull a cheap and complete EFI system from the boneyard and use it to turn a non-running 924 into one that runs. His setup has coolant temp, TPS and AFM, and is from a similar engine. I am sure he will be able to get all the tuning he needs to run better than CIS by simply regulating fuel pressure.

I swear, you can count the number of times you have given positive feedback to people around here on one hand.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Martijnus  



Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 2019
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:


I swear, you can count the number of times you have given positive feedback to people around here on one hand.


http://thewe.cc/thewei/&/&/images4/india/r2588996261.jpe

although I have to agree with Min that you lack the accessability to modifying your mapping.

Mappable EFI can't be done cheap imho. So this is a great solution if you don't want to be able to tune it (because when you have the possibility to tune, you'd still lack the ability for some persons)
_________________
"Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)

924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is possible to get AFR pretty satisfactory using adjustable FPR at least in WOT. If part throttle is more or less ok after that, you can leave it like that or make a slight compromise (both areas will be slightly off, but car would be driveable).

On NA engine this would work, some people use this adjustable FPR approach with stock injection systems and self-installed turbos.

It's not optimal for sure but it is cheap and as always, it is matter of testing. I am pretty sure that there are cars with EFI systems that would work reasonably well on 924 NA but one has to have time and will to test these.
I would be interested in hearing about the results from OP after he hooks up WBo2 meter.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:
Or, perhaps OP's purpose was to pull a cheap and complete EFI system from the boneyard and use it to turn a non-running 924 into one that runs. His setup has coolant temp, TPS and AFM, and is from a similar engine. I am sure he will be able to get all the tuning he needs to run better than CIS by simply regulating fuel pressure.


I agree, he probably will be able to get what he needs by monkeying with the fuel pressure, maybe even just monkeying with the coolant temp resistor could adjust his fuel enough. However, from the sounds of things, he's only adjusted timing thus far giving very little thought to correct fueling. -which is why I asked-

Rasta Monsta wrote:
I swear, you can count the number of times you have given positive feedback to people around here on one hand.


Perhaps your correct, but if you only post negatively 1/4 of the time Rasta(which you do), you've still posted negatively quite a bit more than me. However your point is well taken, I think its time I took another long hiatus from this place.

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure man, take your ball and go home. . .criminy.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ksis  



Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 120
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you all for your interest.
There has been no tuning of any kind. My objective was to install a drop in system to make the car a reliable form of transportation for my son as this will be his first car.

when I find my 924, I will spend the time and research better options.

I have as of yet to install the O2 sensor so I know I am not operating at optimal performance. When this happens I will also be installing a test bung for a 02 meter to see what is going on. I know I will be able to adjust the AFM slightly.
I did short write up on the install for those that were interested and sent it via email. I will go back through and reread all the concerns and reply accordingly.
_________________
77 924
64 Spitfire
76 TR6
04 Jetta
77 Schwinn Scrambler
Awsome pair of Chucks

http://www.cardomain.com/id/ksiskin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BionicBalls  



Joined: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 642
Location: Charlotte, NC

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I took the time to convert the word document over into a post so everybody can see what has been done. I for one think this is an awesome idea and effort. How about we as a community stop criticizing and try to offer suggestions. Maybe we have finally found a cheap way to upgrade our cars into the computer era. Thank You Ksis.

This is a brief over view of what I did. I will rip the system out, take pics and do a new install. That is how easy this was…

Let me begin by having you click this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digifant to get an understanding of how the Digi system works.

The below pic shows what sensor input is required to make the Digi system work.



-The distributor will be the unit from your donor car. The only modification you will need to make is to swap out the gear.



- The mass air sensor will come from you donor car. The only modification will be to purchase an adaptor from your local FAP to mount a conical air filter. Remember to include the plastic pipe from the donor car.



-The throttle body will be from the donor car. This is nice because it is a direct bolt on and the only modification is swapping out the cable linkage.



- The knock sensor will be from the donor car. The verdict is still out on the mounting location. I have not seen any difference in performance. I believe this is due to the low compression of the 2.0.



-The O2 is from your donor car and a direct bolt in. If you do not have a sensor, as I didn’t, a bung will need to be welded into the exhaust. I have not done this as of yet.



-The coolant sensor will again come from the donor vehicle. There are two options for the placement. I chose the latter, as I wanted to retain all of my original CIS components if I ever chose to sell the vehicle or replace it. The first option is to replace the sensor with that from a Subaru, any year or make as they are the same. They operate in the same range and will thread right into the location of the thermotime switch. The second option is to disconnect the bypass hose and insert the sensor directly in the hose and clamp. The only modification is to grind a small channel in the rim of the hose to accept the wires. I would say this is an unorthodox move, but if you think of a universal temp gauge, this is what they do.



-Idle air control valve. This will come from you donor car and will slip right into place with the use of 3/8 hose and a small brass adaptor on the throttle body hose where you cold air vale was.



- Fuel injectors are from the donor car and will use the o-rings from your old injectors. You will retain the original plastic inserts that are threaded into the head. I am currently looking into changes to get the injector farther into the head but this seems to work just fine. The fuel rail is you choice. I commited sin and used copper fittings. I did cannibalize a 98 SAAB turbo rail for the injector cups. There were easy to remove, as the SAAB rail was made of “COPPER” and had “BRASS” fitting brazed on….



-Fuel relay. Any four prong relay will work. This will be hooked to the only three wires that you will route into the cockpit. I will list the color coding and mounting later.


You can see the red/white, red and black/yellow wires from the harness.

-Hall control unit is from the donor car and will mount with the ECU on the driver’s side of the engine compartment by the windshield wiper motor.



Complete install. O


_________________
1980 924 NA
1982 931
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ksis  



Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 120
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bionic Balls,
You get the Hero of the day award.

Thanks for converting my write up. I know it was a quick install, the system is not fool proof and more research needs to be done. I feel a junkyard system that was less than 150 bucks, needed no guess work, was a drop in system, how could I go wrong.
As I said before, if this were my car and I could afford to keep it off the road and have a open bank account, I would do more and spend more.
_________________
77 924
64 Spitfire
76 TR6
04 Jetta
77 Schwinn Scrambler
Awsome pair of Chucks

http://www.cardomain.com/id/ksiskin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Horizonblue  



Joined: 13 Oct 2011
Posts: 307
Location: Sorring city, Denmark, Europe

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could be interesting to test the car on a dyno. Does it have more horsepower, less horsepower or the same as before.....
_________________
Euro 924, 1976

"If you can't fix it, don't break it"

/P.G. Andersen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ksis  



Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 120
Location: New York

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The throttle response and top end feels better. I do how ever feel less at the lower end. This trade off is no big loss as it will discourage my son.
_________________
77 924
64 Spitfire
76 TR6
04 Jetta
77 Schwinn Scrambler
Awsome pair of Chucks

http://www.cardomain.com/id/ksiskin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group