Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

turbo or supercharger possible ?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hadrian017  



Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Posts: 55
Location: Malta

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:35 am    Post subject: turbo or supercharger possible ? Reply with quote

Hi,

I have a euro 924 with N/A engine and i have converted it to dual carbs I would like to know if adding a turbo or a supercharger would be possible with minor changes and how much are the expenses

cheers
_________________
www.myspace.com/hadrianmansueto
www.myspace.com/tapedivision check ouy my music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
the_mad_electrician  



Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 1073
Location: Central Georgia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

s/cs and turbos don't really work well with carbs
_________________
81 924 N/A

2004 Ranger "Edge"

2005 Mazda 6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They can if the carbs are designed for blow-through, which the OP's are unlikely to be.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
leadfoot  



Joined: 11 Dec 2002
Posts: 2222
Location: gOLD cOAST Australia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

many sc applications use draw through carbs... blow through is more complicated...

sc will be more easier to adapt with current 9.3:1 pistons, but will require alot of customs parts, manifold, pulley, brackets etc... so if you can weld great.
an sc12, eaton m45 or small sc running 6psi no intercooler will give you a reliable system with around the 150/170hp and plenty of torque to boot.
It will also fit in the engine bay nicely

there are no real bolt on turbo systems apart from BAE which are near impossible to find and still require mods to the exhaust system.

also suggest if your making brackets move the alternator at the same time to the other side of the engine bay.
stu
_________________
1981 ROW 924 Turbo -
carbon fiber GT mish mash
LS1 conversion in progress...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fiat22turbo  



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 4040
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anything is possible.

I would suggest not using carbs and use the stock intake and throttle body with an EFI conversion (or even the stock CIS)

However, if you're stuck on the carbs, then you'll need to research how people have adapted forced induction to the type of carb you're running.

If you want to run blow through on a set of sidedrafts, you'll likely need to make a sealed plenum to route the output of the turbocharger or supercharger to the inlet of each carb throat. Plus jetting and fuel system requirements will be quite different.

Suck through might work better, to a point. You can leverage the stock intake minus the throttle body (or gut the stock one) and mount the carb on the inlet of the turbo or supercharger. However, some of the drawback are that most have to split the two throats of the sidedraft to have one blade operated off vacuum to have decent drivability, also you can't intercool the charge as it is loaded with fuel and cooling it after the fact will cause the fuel to pool and drop out of the air.

The higher compression ratio of the euro 924's will limit the amount of boost you can run safely. If you're serious about following this path, then perhaps find a set of US-spec pistons (I'm sure someone in the states would be willing to trade) which will lower the compression ratio. Forcing the air into the cylinders causes the compression ratio in the motor to increase artificially.

There are some great sources available in print for general forced induction planning, configuration and tuning plus a number of sites available for knowledge. This quickly becomes a situation where you have to understand the underlying theory well enough to apply it to the real world situation you're dealing with.
_________________
Stefan
1979 924 Carrera GTS (clone-ish)
1988 944 Turbo S (Silver Rose)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
leadfoot  



Joined: 11 Dec 2002
Posts: 2222
Location: gOLD cOAST Australia

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="fiat22turbo"]
The higher compression ratio of the euro 924's will limit the amount of boost you can run safely. If you're serious about following this path, then perhaps find a set of US-spec pistons (I'm sure someone in the states would be willing to trade) which will lower the compression ratio. Forcing the air into the cylinders causes the compression ratio in the motor to increase artificially.
quote]
this is static compression, you also have to look at dynamic compression which can be changed by grinding the duration of a cam and increasing overlap. Chews more fuel but can allow more boost.

I wouldn't even think about suck through turbo... and intercooling under 6psi is also a waste of time
Stu
_________________
1981 ROW 924 Turbo -
carbon fiber GT mish mash
LS1 conversion in progress...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Catamax944  



Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 140
Location: London UK

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Find a renault 5 gt turbo carb ,it might work better.
_________________
'86 944 Club Sport replica
www.cardomain.com/ride/3094204
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tas931  



Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 142
Location: Tasmania, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
s/cs and turbos don't really work well with carbs


thanks i needed a laugh.

couple of people i know (one of which i bought my 924turbo from) both have low-mid 11sec draw through carby setups. we also have a 240 volvo with a similar setup was running high 13.
Here's one running 11.4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqCnJMCp7NU

and for good measure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYAH0SLNADY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Euro924S2  



Joined: 06 Mar 2008
Posts: 215
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A valid point for a race car, but for a road car does draw through carbs not cause poor general drivability and make it difficult geting through the emissions needed for street use.

Personally, if your only planning on running 6psi which is limited by the standard pistons, why not use the 924 turbo CIS system which will give reliable fueling all day long at that level and is easy to plumb in allowing a quicker fabrication period.

Agreed for intercooled 200+bhp motors EFI should be your route but that's a whole different bag of worms!!! (ask me how I know!!!)

Of course there are many ways to achieve good performance - some are just better than others!!!

Cheers, john
_________________
UK spec '83 N/A with 931 motor with Eaton MP62 'charger @ 15psi. EFI - 565cc inj. Standalone Adaptronic ECU. 951 FMIC. Ally rad. Twin throttle. Recirc valve. Custom manifolds and CAI. 232bhp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fiat22turbo  



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 4040
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tas931 wrote:
Quote:
s/cs and turbos don't really work well with carbs


thanks i needed a laugh.

couple of people i know (one of which i bought my 924turbo from) both have low-mid 11sec draw through carby setups. we also have a 240 volvo with a similar setup was running high 13.
Here's one running 11.4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqCnJMCp7NU

and for good measure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYAH0SLNADY


...and I've seen dogs walk upright, but that doesn't mean that it's the best way for them to get around, now is it?
_________________
Stefan
1979 924 Carrera GTS (clone-ish)
1988 944 Turbo S (Silver Rose)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tas931  



Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 142
Location: Tasmania, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A valid point for a race car, but for a road car does draw through carbs not cause poor general drivability and make it difficult geting through the emissions needed for street use.


I have to disagree, drivability is fine, i was putting round in the volvo on the weekend with no issues pulling in top gear from low revs and driving around town. Any fueling system that is not running properly will cause issues.

You could get the carby to pass emmisions with some tuning (to be fair i don't know how strict some of your states are), you do however have to do the same with EFI, when perfected though EFI will of course be better.


Quote:
..and I've seen dogs walk upright, but that doesn't mean that it's the best way for them to get around, now is it?


I have to admit i considered not addressing this as this as it seems the response was written without fully reading/understanding what my previous post was about.

No one said that carby was the best way. My previous post is based on the misconception that some people have about carbys not working well with forced induction. Which as shown by the youtube vids is incorrect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leadfoot  



Joined: 11 Dec 2002
Posts: 2222
Location: gOLD cOAST Australia

PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiat22turbo wrote:
Tas931 wrote:
Quote:
s/cs and turbos don't really work well with carbs


thanks i needed a laugh.

couple of people i know (one of which i bought my 924turbo from) both have low-mid 11sec draw through carby setups. we also have a 240 volvo with a similar setup was running high 13.
Here's one running 11.4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqCnJMCp7NU

and for good measure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYAH0SLNADY


...and I've seen dogs walk upright, but that doesn't mean that it's the best way for them to get around, now is it?


actually if you read the questions hadrian017 never asked what the best solution was, he asked what would be easier to adapt, a sc or turbo to a carb setup... and the cost to do so....
as stated an sc would be my choice, vs pulling the head and doing extensive exhaust mods... SC rpm torque @ 6psi will always be better than a turbo, sorry to burst your bubble but I have the dyno's and receipts to prove this.
The only difference will be in cost if you can weld, because the sc pulley will have to be made and most people can afford a "cheap welder" but not a "cheap lathe".
please start another post entitled "why efi is a better route for fueling performance upgrades" if you want to rant on about megasquirt and quad throttle bodies...
also having fuel pass through the inlet of a supercharger cools down the charge intake temps, which is a bonus for the carb setup.
Stu
_________________
1981 ROW 924 Turbo -
carbon fiber GT mish mash
LS1 conversion in progress...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tas931 wrote:
No one said that carby was the best way. My previous post is based on the misconception that some people have about carbys not working well with forced induction. Which as shown by the youtube vids is incorrect.


Its not a misconception at all, carbs don't work well with forced induction. Sure, you can get them to work. A good example is the old belair a fellow around here drives, good old carb'd supercharged v8. He ends up replacing melted pistons once a year or so (he was in fact investigating doing water injection to help prevent this from occurring). Yep works great.

Reference page 82 of maximum boost. "Although seriously on the decline, and with good reason, a few more carbureted turbo systems will certainly be built"

chapter 8, page 101 "At first glance, the idea of a modern turbocharged engine and carburetors all in the same package appears to be a contradiction. A closer inspection reveals that it is indeed a contradiction. Rather than ignore these antique devices, this chapter will attempt to outline the operating principles behind carburetor integration into a turbo system"

Antique? indeed. But wait, there is more!.

"The reasons carbs do not completely satisfy the fueling requirements of a turbo engine are basic and clear-cut. Two reasons stand out: the airflow range over which a carb can successfully operate, and the inability of a draw through carburetor system to function with an intercooler. A carburetor has three items controlling fuel flow: idle jet, main jet, and air corrector jet- and, on occasion, power jets. While these controlling factors will allow satisfactory operation over a range of 20 to 25 psi absolute (5 to 10 psi boost), there is little hope for accurate fuel mixture control to satisfy either peak performance or any emissions standards. The physical principles of fluid mechanics simply do not allow it."

So, let me repeat this so that we're very very clear. The physical principles of fluid mechanics simply do not allow it. So what does that mean? if your building a turbo or supercharger system from scratch for a 924, don't carb it. You will not get peak performance, or good emissions.

Here is another good quote "Weighing the merits, there is virtually no reason to build a draw-through system unless one lives in a year-round hot climate and never intends to produce serious power." referencing the inability to intercool and icing up problems. Chapter 8 is all about carburetion on turbo systems.

Will carbs work? sure. Will they work well? not by my definition of 'well'. Argue with the fluid mechanics if you like, but you'll lose, I can guarantee that.

/end rant

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Tas931  



Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 142
Location: Tasmania, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love the carby hating out there for reference i'm an EFI person.

So how many years ago was maximum boost produced.... Even Corky Bell says people use the book to much like a bible (he posts on he Miata forums). While correct for the time period written in, a lot has changed he may or may not have changed his mind about carby's but my point is the book is old people need to stop using it as a gospel.

Certainly sounds like it needs better tunning/Form of cooling the charge. We use water/meth injection on the torana's and volvo Works a treat, I will be putting it on my 924 as well.

I don't need to argue with the principals of fluid mechanics, Corky Bell X decades ago nor anyone else, we have a couple of low-mid 11sec carby turbo's here (1 uses a rayjay off a john deer tractor), that are also street driven. That's good enough for what i would want out of my street car performance wise (maybe your after something else?).

Maybe 1000hp?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH3VezPiLB8

For our 924's i wouldn't be going Carb it seems like a backwards step, if you want tuning to the Nth degree go EFI, best fuel economy again EFI. For me I want to go MS. But it doesn't mean that you can't go fast in a carby forced induction car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tas931 wrote:
the book is old people need to stop using it as a gospel.


And carbs are even older, I wasn't using his book like the bible, simply providing a stronger opinion than my own. Remeber, to you, I'm just some guy on the internet. Got any other well known turbo charging reference books hanging around on your shelf? I could start qouting my fluid mechanics text book, would that have any practical meaning to you? no? didn't think so.

Tas931 wrote:
For our 924's i wouldn't be going Carb it seems like a backwards step


I fail to see why you even bothered posting in this thread then. Some guy posts about turboing his carb'd vehicle, people respond saying 'don't do it'. You post saying lolz, carbs are awesome, they will work great. Then you post "but I wouldn't use them on a 924"

Troll.

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group