Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Low gearing needed ...........

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
muddy924  



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Shropshire. UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:38 am    Post subject: Low gearing needed ........... Reply with quote

The 5 speed box in the NA 924's is often described as "Audi based".

I need to drastically lower the gearing of my '82 car for motorsport.

Are any of the 1980's Audi 100 transaxles a straight swap i.e. is the bellhousing the same as a 924 or is it as I suspect a completely different casting?

If they are different then does anyone know if I could fit all the internals of an Audi 100 diesel box (4.56 diff.) into a 924 casing ?

Or by the same route, just fit the CWP (4.7 ratio) itself and fifth-gear pair (0.64) from an Audi Coupe - into a 924 box thus retaining the 924's first gear reduction of 3.6 and thereby getting the benefit of a really low overall first gear AND keeping a decent overdrive fifth ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bass gt  



Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 971
Location: Johannesburg for now!!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

How low do you need to go?? what kind of motorsport? i am using a 944 box in my '24 turbo, and with 21"Dia tyres, the g=earing iss very low. Check out the video's i posted here. You can see what gear I'm in at places like Gurston, Harewood ect.

Steve
_________________
Front Wheel Drive is the Devil's work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
924RACR  



Joined: 29 Jul 2001
Posts: 9081
Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If he's not running a turbo, then yes, the stock gearing is too high - 5th gear is virtually unnecessary. I've run mine up to 110 in 4th (with stock gearing including 4.111 R+P), only gets to 6500rpm at 108mph with my tires (225/45/15 Hoosier R6's)...

Sadly, I've never found time to investigate different ratios, though I could certainly benefit from them!!
_________________
Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
bass gt  



Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 971
Location: Johannesburg for now!!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vaughan,

The answers simple then.....run a turbo!! The 944 box has a R+P gearing of 3.889, so maybe that is an answer. I don't know hespecific ratios however, but i do know the final is 3.889

Steve
_________________
Front Wheel Drive is the Devil's work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
924RACR  



Joined: 29 Jul 2001
Posts: 9081
Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, if only it were that simple. SCCA doesn't really allow turbos to compete, not anywhere near the same way I'm racing, let alone worry the added cost...
_________________
Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
muddy924  



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Shropshire. UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Steve/all

The 924 is being prepared for Classic Trials of the muddy variety. That uniquely British motorsport where we attempt to drive roadgoing 2WD cars up steep slippery slopes, mainly old unsurfaced roads or forest tracks. Unlike rallying there is no emphasis on speed, just an ability to get the car up hills as steep as 1 in 3 and do 'restarts' from wet rocky slabs/deep mud/loose stones on the steeper parts.

Main requirements are :- high ground clearance, sump guard, plenty of traction aided by large diameter wheels and a lightened car with weight shifted rearward, robust drive-train, torquey engine - and a first gear with an overall reduction ratio of around 16 or 17:1
For the road section when driving back 100+ miles home after the event then a decent high 5th gear helps progress and fuel economy.

Standard UK NA 924 has a 3.6 first and a 3.9 diff giving an overall ratio of 14:1.

The '86 Audi 100 diesel 'box has 3.6 first and 4.556 diff giving 16.4 overall.

The Coupe GT had a 4.7 diff (or a 4.9 in some books) - but a 2.8 first gear - so it needs to be put in a 924 box to produce a decent overall ratio of around 17:1.

I will initially run on 185/80x14 tyres but may go up to high profile 15" tyres (possibly even 16") - if I can get the gearing low enough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
v8carreragts  



Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 665
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The AUDI 016 ratios. There is a 4.56 as well as a 4.77.

trans ID#

AMM; AMN 4.77

AAX; AAY; 2U; 6U 4.77
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
v8carreragts  



Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 665
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oops, the AAX; AAY; 2U; 6U is 4.56
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rich H  



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 2665
Location: Preston, Lancs, UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are feeling really stupid the VW vans had an option of a 3:1 reduction box that fits on the outboard end of the driveshaft... Bolts to the swinging arm.

Might be a bit on the low side.

MY Dad used to be very competative in Production car trials in the 70's and 80's (before it got serious) in his Hillman Imp, we have a loft full of trophies. Compete in it at the weekend then go shopping in it on monday sort of thing.
_________________
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress...
1980 Porsche 924 S2 DITC Turbo - Original spec
1978 Homo-Sapiens - Tired spec
1953 Landrover S1 - Pensioner Spec
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
muddy924  



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Shropshire. UK

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rich. I have a memory of seeing a buggy doing trials with the reduction hubs - very effective !

v8
Now we are getting somewhere. Thanks. This ID# is the one stamped along with the date on the topmost part of the bellhousing?

Does your source happen to say which models had the AMM and AMN ?

These Audi 100's are getting very thin in UK breakers yards but today I found a late '87 100 GT Coupe. I could see enough of the bellhousing to tell it was NOT the same as a 924 - there being no hole for the gearchange link. I am still hoping that an earlier 4.56 diesel box might be the same as a 924.

Update :-
Following your lead on these codes I found a fairly detailed table of ratios on http://www.gt40club.com/technics.htm#Audiaxles

All I need now is to find which models of Audi had the gearbox I'm chasing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group