|
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Walter
Joined: 17 Jul 2018 Posts: 3 Location: Berry NSW
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:08 am Post subject: Tech differences between M31/04 blocks and M31/01 |
|
|
Hi to fellow lovers of the 931/2.
I have had 924's on and off since the early 80's and currently have a 1980 RHD 931 with the oval throttle body manifold and a Eur /ROW Vin No in Sydney Australia.
It has had continual overheating problems in normal use despite overhauling all the usual suspects and fitting an electric water pump and manual fan override switches to try to reduce heat buildup. It also hasn't the power of similar 931 Eur/ROW cars I have driven.
I think i may have found the cause of the problem and need some tech advice. My engine block is a M31/04 which was apparently sourced by an earlier owner from the US during a visit. He bought a long engine with the round throttle body but only fitted the block so I have a hybrid M31/04 block with M31/01 everything else.
What are the differences other than pistons and compression? The flywheel is an M31/01 item with timing marks in the 20 degree range and I understand timing for a M31/04 is 6-10 degrees and the later flywheel is lighter with different markings. Is there other differences in maybe the distributor mapping or engine control unit which creates the different timing.
As I have the original M31/01 block I(less pistons and rods) I could rebuild that but trying to avoid that option. Alternatively I could change just the pistons (advice on supplier of oversize Turbo pistons appreciated) to ROW items but that will not address overheating. I could fit a M31/04 manifold and distributor( Part No?) if that addresses overheating but that would give me a lower power engine.( I could live with that...just)
Looking for some solid knowledge of what is the actual differences between the two engines so I can sort my problems, make a plan and fall in love with my 931 again. Thanks in anticipation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterld
Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 946 Location: Noosa Heads QLD Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Walter, welcome aBoard.
I don't believe your overheating issues are due to the mismatch of blocks per se! It may well be in the installation of them, but not due to the different years as such.
M31/01: 1979 and 1980 924T 7.5:1 comp 170bhp (ROW) oval, two chamber throttle body. Normal (lighter) flywheel, clutch and pressure plate.
M31/04: 1981 Japan and 1982 USA/Can. Round single chamber throttle body. And should have rubber damped (heavy) flywheel/clutch. The 1981+ 924T in ROW specs had 8.5:1 comp and 177bhp but USA/Can versions were less due to catalytic convertors. These later 924T, known as Series 2, also used the DITC system to manage spark, which was timed off the flywheel which has an imbedded precious metal cypher.
Most items can be mixed and matched.
EG. I have a S1 block with S2 head/induction/Ditc etc. using S2 USA flywheel with normal clutch and 951 turbo........so almost anything is possible!
As for overheating, I would systematically check:
thermostat/radiator/fan sender/overflow bottle/water outlet at back of head for blockage/head gasket/water pump gallery. _________________ 80/81 932/8 ROW |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterld
Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 946 Location: Noosa Heads QLD Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Walter, welcome aBoard.
I don't believe your overheating issues are due to the mismatch of blocks per se! it may well be in the installation of them, but not due to the different years as such.
M31/01: 1979 and 1980 924T 7.5:1 comp 170bhp (ROW) oval, two chamber throttle body. Normal (lighter) flywheel, clutch and pressure plate.
M31/04: 1981 Japan and 1982 USA/Can. Round single chamber throttle body. And should have rubber damped (heavy) flywheel/clutch. The 1981+ 924T in ROW specs had 8.5:1 comp and 177bhp but USA/Can versions were less due to catylitic convertors. These later 924T, known as Series 2, also used the DITC system to manage spark, which was timed off the flywheel which has an imbedded precious metal cypher.
Most items can be mixed and matched.
EG. I have a S1 block with S2 head/induction/Ditc etc. using S2 flywheel with normal clutch and 951 turbo........so almost anything is possible!
As for overheating, I would systematically check:
thermostat/radiator/fan sender/overflow bottle/water outlet at back of head for blockage/head gasket/water pump gallery. _________________ 80/81 932/8 ROW |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Walter
Joined: 17 Jul 2018 Posts: 3 Location: Berry NSW
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Peter
Thanks for your reply. One thing I can't get my head around is the difference in ignition timing between motors if they are so interchangeable.
Haynes manual for Turbo models on P124 gives 20 BTDC at 2000 for all except UK and UK 25 BTDC at 2000. What causes that difference and 5 deg is significant in timing and can lead to heat issues.
I have the low compression block with a engine management for the head suiting a high compression block. Is there something in the management that compensates for timing difference.
I have reviewed cooling except rear of head around the heater and block pipes and have soured a replacement pipe. Next job!!!!
Still not 100% though on why timing is so different..???
Any thoughts appreciated.
Thanks Walter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carrera RSR
Joined: 08 Jan 2010 Posts: 2309 Location: Somerset, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I chased a coolant issue for over 6 months after engine rebuild + performance mods. Complete overhaul and replacement of the coolant system, larger ally rad holding far more coolant than stock, more efficient fan, manual over ride, swirl pot, etc. etc. Tried various concoctions of de ionised water + water wetters and no anti freeze and still had hot running and when boosting it would spit coolant out of the expansion tank. Turned out to be a cracked/porous head leaking boost into the coolant. Replaced the head and the problem evaporated.
Stock S1/S2 ignition curves will not be the cause of increased combustion/coolant temps
The difference in ignition curves is a slow evolution of the turbo motor, turbo specs and CR changes. In the most part all are interchangeable.
Using the low compression S1 block and S2 ignition/DITC will not upset the motor, performance or coolant temps. I think there is something else amiss with the system, pump, radiator. Unless the ignition/boost is way out of kilter with stock spec. _________________ 1980 931 - forged pistons, Piper cam, K27/26 3257 6.10 hybrid turbo, 951 FMIC, custom intake, Mittelmotor dizzy & cam pulley, H&S exhaust, GAZ Gold, Fuch'ed, Quaife
Now www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=34690
Then www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=31252 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|