Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

FRANCO CAM GEARS...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rick MacLaren  
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And I'll never know about the 931...but I'll assume it doesn't work there...
Back to top
aussie931  
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Re using a Franco on a 931.

I emailed George last year and asked about using the gear on a 931 here is his response:

"Yes, there are a few things to consider for a Turbo application. The gear needs
a second keyway broached into it so that all of the advance is to the bottom
end. This would set the gear up at +10 degrees of advance below 3,500 rpm and
in the retard position the gear would be at factory zero. Turbo and
Supercharged cars need this setting or you will loose horsepower with the
normal installation of +7degrees and -3 degrees of retard.

Also, it is best if the ignition system is crank fired. If the distributor is
driven by the camshaft gear and controls dynamic advance, then the automatic
gear will change your ignition advance curve. There are ways to compensate."

FURTHER CORRESPONDENSE:

Schrick makes some good stage 2 cams that work well with the gear. I
have installed Schrick 276 degree duration x .430 inch lift into Audi 5
cylinder engines with good dyno results and happy customers.

I did not purchase as at the time the money was better spent getting a 944 intercooler and front end panels for fitment.

To do properly it would appear that all the following would be required:

1. Cam Gear
2. DIS system
3. Revised Cam

Adds up to way more than just the purchase price.

Just my 2 cents worth.
Cheers,
Back to top
Richard  
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guys! Guys! Let's stay togther on this. There already have been numerous posts concerning the gear. Please take a little time researching a topic . I will try to sum it up again: 1) I already posted a notice saying we needed 25 firm orders to make
George Franco consider a new batch. 2) No one has stepped foward and offered to coordinate the effort. It is not magically going to happen by saying "I want one" on a post. Someone has to say " I'm in charge". 3) There are two ways to deal with the timing issue. Either have your distributor recurved with 10 degrees extra static advance or buy a digital (distributorless) ignition system. 4) As with most performance gains, better results is acheived if you make changes in a coordinated fashion. A big cam with low compression and a low flow head will yield alot less hp than if you did it all. It is understood that the Franco gear is part of a package deal. It is a step along the way. We all agree that flowing the head is the most important thing to do.
5) For the disbelievers, fine, Franco has already done the dyno runs, but not on a 924. Why don't you be the first to step foward and do it yourself? To say " I won't buy it untill I see the numbers" is placing the fiscal burden on someone else. Apple Bit has apparently had real good results with it. Trust him or not. Why doesn't someone send him the money for a trip to the dyno for a before and after? He has already spent big bucks on experimentation that he unselfishly shares with the rest of us for free! Get it? I spent extra money on a G-tech Pro so I could get some numbers. 6) The cost of the gear is going to be higher than $300. George needs to go out for new vendor bids and most likely they will be higher because it has been several years since the last batch. Peace & Love Richard
Back to top
Richard  
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just re-read the first post. It looks like Jwalin is stepping foward to be "the man". I hope everyone who wants one e-mails him off the board so he can get a firm commitment. I hope it works out for you'all.
Back to top
Richard  
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just re-read the first post. It looks like Jwalin is stepping foward to be "the man". I hope everyone who wants one e-mails him off the board so he can get a firm commitment. I hope it works out for you'all.
Back to top
Rick MacLaren  
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Aussie. I'll stick to dropping weight and maybe a MAP sensor later on.
Back to top
jwalin  
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I will be the man! I will do all the leg work and gathering of orders....I will get with Mr Franco on a tenative price....meanwhile everyone who wants one please email me at jwalin@megagate.com.

Also, if you want me to contact a specific group of VW or Audi enthusiasts that you know of, let me know in an e-mail. I don't know of any, but I will be looking on the net...

let's try and get this going.

I agree with everyone that this gear is part of a package, and won't have much affect on a stock motor. The key to hp in the 924 engine is head work, and that can only take you so far because of the poor design of the head. Then there is the ignition issue, which is best solved by using a crank triggered unit.

And it isn't worth the trouble for a 931.

So...this is geared (heehee) for people who are putting money into building a motor, not for stock. Please understand this when I ask for a final commitment.

anyone with questions, email me...

-jef
Back to top
teo  



Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 637
Location: Hungary, Europe

PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

uhhm, let me be the first to back off. It's tempting to have that gear, but I think I should have everything else straight first.

-1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwalin  
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2002 2:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's looking very bleak.....one person has emailed me....

shall we lay this dead horse down?

I even e-mailed the Audi-VW groups and no response....

eeeeek
-jef
Back to top
eturbo924  
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2002 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you can get others I might be interested.

What kind of time frame has Franco given you?
Back to top
jwalin  
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2002 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No time frame yet...need to get closer to the magic 25 before the details are hammered out...

-jef
Back to top
larso  
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2002 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With digital ignition on the later 931s it would be no problem right? Definately not worth the hassle on the 80 931 since you would get detonation! But on the later 931s it woudl be fine right?

Why the hell aren't there any VW dynos on this thing! Or are there? Please forward the links if you have any, there's gotta be some dude who proves this thing GOOD, or BAD.
Back to top
Richard  
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2002 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Franco's web site is off the net now. I copied it a few weeks ago and there is no dyno run but a table shows reduction in 0-60 times of 2.8 seconds, 1/4 time of 1.9 seconds and plus 1/4 speeds of 19 mph in a stock 1800cc VW Golf to one with Franco and hot cam. This was an improvement of 16mph from the hot cam alone. The stock cam and Franco gear had some gain, but most with both installed.
Back to top
AppleBit  



Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 1516
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guys,

I will do a dyno run with and without the gear and share the info to the world... No charge. I will do this because you all need to see the difference just the gear makes. I want to as well.

I will do this within a month because right now I have been experimenting with camshafts without good sucess... I found I need to get better than stock springs to go any further with my cams...

_________________
Classic British Sports Car Restoration v6 + v8 Engine Conversion Swaps

Porsche 924 Wide Body LS1 Corvette 500 Horsepower Engine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
81turbo  
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great Jon. Your car is heavily modified making your dyno runs useless to the majority of the people interested in buying the gear. Think before you convince a bunch of people to spend $300 plus dollars on a part that may have no gains on the stock engine. Mr. Franco has made it clear that there is HP gain on heavily modified cars. Although 2.8 seconds 0-60 sounds outlandish. Honestly there is no way that could possibly happen. If the gear works so well don't you think that EVERY VW owner would most likely have one? There is no shortage of modified VW's. Power is not free and on an N/A engines most people will take anything they can get. If there is benefit I stand corrected. But those claims are ridiculous. Come on guys, you are dreaming if you believe those numbers. Vario cam is a very efficient system and this comes no where close. The numbers on Vario Cam aren't that good. -Ryan
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group