| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| So What has the most appeal? - That is what should I try to put together for the Masses? |
| AIR TO WATER - TOP MOUNT |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| AIR TO WATER - NOSE MOUNT |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| AIR TO AIR - TOP MOUNT CGT/937 STYLE |
|
36% |
[ 11 ] |
| AIR TO AIR FRONT MOUNT |
|
16% |
[ 5 ] |
| AIR TO AIR NOSE MOUNT - 951 STYLE |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| AIR TO WATER BARREL STYLE |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| WHAT? OH GREAT ANOTHER POST FROM THE MAD HATTER |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| WTF - WHO CARES |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| SOME ONE SEDATE THIS GUY ALREADY |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 30 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ESC944

Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 747 Location: FL
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:19 am Post subject: BOLT ON INTERCOOLER? |
|
|
Alrighty - over under my latest toy thread the discussion of a bolt on 937 style intercooler came up as well as general intercooler.
So the basic commentary was:
| Khal wrote: | Did you make that? I mean, yourself... with your own two hands?
I read your description but I'm still not sure if I understand exactly what it is..?
It's a throttle-body spacer with twin injectors. For more fuel or NOS. Have I got that right?
It looks awesome. If you can make that stuff, why do I not see a bolt-on intercooler kit yet?!!! Please, I'm begging you, make something that us dummies can actually use! |
AND:
| flosho wrote: | ESC, I would say just something that is simple and works and is a bolt on deal.. At least to me it doesn't really matter if it is a replica or not, and keeping my stock hood, well stock, is much more pleasing to me.
Or do a front mount intercooler with the pipes to hook it all up, no need for a water sprayer or anything like that.. Just a nice clean FM.  |
So then I am thinking I have enough intercoolers and intercooler cores and my 931 available - So what is it going to be chaps?
I see these considerations:
AIR TO WATER - TOP MOUNT
AIR TO WATER - NOSE MOUNT - 951 STYLE ONLY WATER INSTEAD OF AIR
AIR TO AIR - TOP MOUNT CGT/937 STYLE - REQUIRES A HOLE IN THE HOOD
AIR TO AIR FRONT MOUNT
AIR TO AIR NOSE MOUNT - 951 STYLE
AIR TO WATER BARREL STYLE
Now I like air to water - but it adds complexitylots of parts and plumbing
Tank
Pump
Small Radiator
No hole in hood for top mount
Top mount A2A - limited in size
Hole in the hood
Seals
Hood Scoop
May not be for everyone
Nose mount requires almost as much plumbing as front mount
Also limited on size
Of course requires the nose be removed so you can install IC
Can open area up for larger unit
Removing Nose and/or Mods for larger IC lot of work for the end user
I can see a kit with hardware to facilitate reinstall of nose or even fiberglass or carbon fiber replacement
Front Mount - requires longest runs of intake pipes
Can cause heat issues with radiator
Would require 2 fans on radiator - 6 fin - 951 style or aftermarket
Unit would need to be flush mounted to radiator or AC core.
Barrel Style - can be installed in line with pipes - but still A2W
Requires same stuff as other Air to water
Smaller profile
Easy to install in line - like installing any hard pipe
Can use more than one - but can be expensive
I will post pictures after I get back from church |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
GTR style: front mount, direction: air enters IC from underside and IC outlet straight to the log-style inlet manifold. Very short plumbing. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESC944

Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 747 Location: FL
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| YES CAN DO THAT AS WELL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sequential

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 500 Location: BANNED
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
the most feasible is the CGT style as it will bolt right in and require the least amount of modification to work . it will also be the least expensive
because of the core size ( a plus here ) at .8 bar the intercooler will be effective possible to 1 bar and with a new style bar and plate cooler it will work for most here . _________________ 928 gts prototype
baby blue engine block
steam in 1,2,3,4 sometimes
cold star issues while on stands
112 whp with new 4 valve head and MIS 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hausbrauen

Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 87 Location: 313 USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about a top mount air to water that is designed to replicate the CGT but does not require a hood scoop? _________________ Sid
S2 931
CFO Hausbrauen Motoren
'06 Sponsors of the 944 Cup and SuperCup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wannaBgroupB
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 13 Location: Augusta, GA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Top-mount air to air....big honkin' hood scoops are sexy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sequential wrote: | the most feasible is the CGT style as it will bolt right in and require the least amount of modification to work . it will also be the least expensive
because of the core size ( a plus here ) at .8 bar the intercooler will be effective possible to 1 bar and with a new style bar and plate cooler it will work for most here . |
Agreed.
As with most things, there's probably a damn good reason why Porsche put the intercooler on top... and my guess is it's simply because it wouldn't fit anywhere else. I don't see any reason to mess with their idea.
And try to keep in mind that not all of us are looking to build 500hp monsters A small, neat, air-to-air top-mount that gives some improvement would be quite nice, thanks. I'd prefer not to have the hood scoop but I'll do it if it's necessary (besides, I really like the look of SoyRacer's car ) _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flosho

Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 3160 Location: Eau Claire, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would vote but I really can't decide on which one I would most want.
Just going over how I feel about everything here.
Topmount:
Does it mach up right by the NACA duct or will we have to purchase a 924/944 hood and cut that up? Or exactly how would the scoop work, I'm not opposed to using the top mount air to air, as it would be real reasonable.
However, what kind of heat soak issues would we suffer in daily driving traffic. It would be sitting right over the exhaust manifold. This would keep plumbing to a minimum and still be efficient, I mean STi's use a top mount and are makin' 300hp so that should be sufficient for most of us..
air/water
This setup is kinda what I'm thinking is like Kenodog's air/water set up. The only draw back is that this would be much more money, however we can keep our stock hoods and stock intake manifolds.
Everyone says this setup is more of a drag racing style set up, not really to be used as a daily driver. I don't daily drive my car but I drive it whenever I can and when its nice out so I wouldn't want this setup if its not suitable for normal driving.
front mount:
Longer pipes, higher engine temps because the front of our cars aren't exactly good for allowing a front mount, this would probably be more cost efficient than air/water but would induce some lag into our powerband..
Then again if we use a log style manifold it isn't going to be any less expensive then an air/water setup
Nose style front mount:
I think the air flow isn't going to be great enough and there isn't enough room to put a good sized intercooler in the nose.. (then again I haven't looked at my car in 4 months... so there could be more room in there than I remember...)
I think an air/water top mount is unreasable becuase it would be less of a head ache to do an CGT top mount instead... same with an air/water nose mount, running something similar to kenodog's setup would allow for a greater core and better cooling..
I guess my vote goes for front mount or carrera gt top mount.. otherwise an air/water in the battery tray.. one of those three..
Another thing that you could think about is just a simple alcohal/water injection system w/o an intercooler... or even on a top mount or front mount with water injection..
Oh..is church over now?  _________________ [This Space For Rent] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think we have two winners.
Make a Carrera GT style intercooler that most people can bolt on their car without having to take off their badge panel and modify the bracing(951 style). For engines running at lower boost levels, .5-1.0 bar.
Make a large front mount with it's own intake manifold. The most efficient way, for engines running 1.0+ bar. _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sequential

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 500 Location: BANNED
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey narrow down the poll options , the masses will always buy black , until you give them a choice. _________________ 928 gts prototype
baby blue engine block
steam in 1,2,3,4 sometimes
cold star issues while on stands
112 whp with new 4 valve head and MIS 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESC944

Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 747 Location: FL
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I dont think you can reduce the poll options.
Alright so I am back - long day.
Church - then ran into some of the Ford guys, who are part of the local club and go to my church - they are all worked up about my v6 kit and the kit I am carrying that converts the 99-04 stang into a more 06 GT looking ride. That turned into a tune session and BBQ - we grilled some burgers and dogs, kids played on the slip and slide and we upgrade the XR7 - new intercooler - new injectors, MAFTuner kit, Chip, tweaking - was making 600HP last dyno - 351 twin turbo. Any who - long day, good times.
Sorry About the long delay.
So lets do some pics shall we? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESC944

Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 747 Location: FL
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well one way to go about it for the DIY - convert something - like air to water:
Front Mount -
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESC944

Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 747 Location: FL
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESC944

Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 747 Location: FL
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TOP MOUNT
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
81turbo

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 1065 Location: Oakland, CA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That Ford top-mount will not clear the hood on the 931. I have tried to mock up a fitting and it is about and inch or so too tall. It is a shame that is a very nice core! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|