| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dwak

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 839 Location: Eastern Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:43 am Post subject: Fuel Alcohol |
|
|
Am researching fuel alcohol production these days and am contemplating setting up a small production plant in central america where I have a few connections. I am finding lots of info on the net but no decent forums like this one. Anyone know of one?
Also, has anyone tried straight ethanol or ethanol/gas mixes in 924's. Turbo and S model's especially.
dwak |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_in_AU

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 2743 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've run across a few good sites with info on making fuel alcohol while researching ethanol for human consumption (purely for personal use of course) but didn't save any URLs.
My alcohol ends up costing about $3.60 per litre of 95% ethanol so it's a bit expensive to throw into a car. Besides, it tastes too good.
This site http://www.homedistiller.org/ has a lot of good introductory info and maybe some useful links. It's human consumption oriented but there is some info on fuel if I remember correctly.
I'd suggest that google is your friend here. _________________ 1979 924 (Gone to a better place)
1974 Lotus 7 S4 "Big Valve" Twin-cam (waiting)
1982 924 (As featured on Wikipedia)
Learn to love your multimeter and may the search be with you |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dwak

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 839 Location: Eastern Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Peter. I know that one. 'Running_on_alcohol.tripod.com' is a great site too but mostly for vehicular fuel.
Keep up the great work, mate.
dwak |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My god, what are you using as a mash for that, for it to be so expensive?
Even using pure sugar, it should only cost around $2.50 CDN for a liter... Using grain it should be about $0.75...
As for building a plant, there's not all that much to it. You need to build a distillition apparatus, a reflux column type is a must, and you need to have an apparatus for chemical denaturing to remove what little water remains after distillation... You can set up a small scale plant at home, just make sure that none of it ends up going around the neighbourhood, that's how you end up police at your door... _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_in_AU

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 2743 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CBass wrote: | My god, what are you using as a mash for that, for it to be so expensive?
Even using pure sugar, it should only cost around $2.50 CDN for a liter... Using grain it should be about $0.75...
|
Economies of scale. I'm using pure sugar and getting about 11 litres of vodka at 45% per batch after I water it down and filter it. It costs me about $6.00 for 8 kilos of sugar and $9.50 for the super-enhanced yeast and nutrient. I kinda think that $1.50 for a litre of drinking vodka is quite reasonable.
 _________________ 1979 924 (Gone to a better place)
1974 Lotus 7 S4 "Big Valve" Twin-cam (waiting)
1982 924 (As featured on Wikipedia)
Learn to love your multimeter and may the search be with you |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pat Dolan
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 26 Location: Martensville, SK Canada
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CBass wrote: | | and you need to have an apparatus for chemical denaturing to remove what little water remains after distillation... ... |
I think you meant "dehydration". "denaturing" means to poison the ethanol with something (as in gasoline) to render it not consummable.
However. the last thing you want to do is take the water out. Water is fully soluable in ethanol, and some of the sweetest running engines I have ever seen use 1/3 water, 2/3 ethanol. The change of phase from liquid to vapour for water is a much more efficient way of converting the energy liberated from the fuel into pressure in the cylinder - and aqueos fuels can do so at temperatures so low as to end up with virtually zero NOX emissions.
The other secret to using alcohol as a fuel is to have the appropriate compression ratio, or MASSIVE boost. The downside is that if you live someplace cold, there is little waste heat (especially in aqueous ethanol) to run a heater.
Of course, once you have come this far, why would you use spark ignition? The answer is to go with catalytic ingnition (www.smartplugs.com).
Pat _________________ All kinds of German cars (mostly VW-P-A)
1980 924/M471/going Audi turbodiesel!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
endwrench

Joined: 07 Dec 2002 Posts: 1631 Location: Victor, Montana
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Peter_in_AU wrote: |
This site http://www.homedistiller.org/ has a lot of good introductory info and maybe some useful links. It's human consumption oriented but there is some info on fuel if I remember correctly.
|
Great Peter!! Thanks for the link. I already make full mash beer and it looks like I am just a short length of copper tubing away from making my own spirits too. I need another hobby like I need a hole in my head (My mouth is watering already!!!)
Todd |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leadfoot

Joined: 11 Dec 2002 Posts: 2222 Location: gOLD cOAST Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey peter at 1.31$ for premium fuel now it won't be long before you receive a PM from me....
Leadfoot  _________________ 1981 ROW 924 Turbo -
carbon fiber GT mish mash
LS1 conversion in progress... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ozzie

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 4448 Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am doing the same as Peter and after I have added some bourbon flavour and soaked it in oak chips I have a pretty good brew afterwards.
The police couldn't give 2 hoots. Its the tax man who wants his cut.
Customs and excise. _________________ Porsche 924 1984 (UK import) NA
Its AUTO and its BLACK
Montego Black on black/red
Engineer of Electro/Mechanical Systems Maintenance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dwak

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 839 Location: Eastern Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cool, now we're cooking with alcohol. The dehydrating is necessary if you intend to blend with gasoline but otherwiise you can use the high proof straight just fine. Also, end prices are a fraction of pump gasoline if you use market price/wholesale molasses or corn etc.
I've ordered the plans for a mini-industrial/column still.
If you're going for personal use better use silver solder etc.
dwak |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ozzie

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 4448 Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use SS, no copper or lead, rubber seals and food grade hoses. _________________ Porsche 924 1984 (UK import) NA
Its AUTO and its BLACK
Montego Black on black/red
Engineer of Electro/Mechanical Systems Maintenance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Copper is fine to use, in fact it has a chemical reaction which breaks down some of the nastier stuff coming through the still.
Peter, you can save a bundle by dropping that expensive yeast. EC-1118 wine yeast will brew to almost as high a proof, 36-40 proof(18-20%) given the right temperatures. You can start it as high as 30c first few days, although you have to gradually lower the temperature to around 15c for the last few days. I found working to about 10% alcohol is faster anyways, considering you can brew it at higher temps, faster and the product is cleaner and less smelly.
With the right kind of still, you can see 180+ proof on teh first run, all you need is a reflux column. 1.5 meters of 60cm pipe, packed with steel wool pot scrubbers will result in about 95% alcohol on the first run, provided the distillation is at the correct temperatures.
I can understand not wanting to bother with mashing, it's really a lot of extra effort to go to when you can just mix sugar and be done with it.
As for denaturing/dehydrating, the chemical dehydrants I have used denature the alcohol by their nature<pun intended>, so I've always referred to it as denaturing.
For a personal use still, copper and lead free solder work fine. You don't have to go to the trouble of brazing, etc.
My first large design used a 50 liter stainless steel keg. I cut out the valve and screwed a male threaded 2" stainless pipe coupling into the hole. I soldered around this to seal it, I had plans for welding it but never had the equipment handy back then. This attached to a 2" cast iron female pipe coupling, threaded onto a" 2" threaded to 2" female torch on fitting", which then was soldered to a 3' length of 2" copper pipe, packed with steel wool to make a reflux column. After that it went through a smaller length of rigid pipe with a 2' water jacket, the inlet and outlet pipes for the jacket passed through the still column, helping to control the reflux temperature.
This design would swallow two full 5 gallon buckets, and produce as much as 7 liters per run of 95% alcohol.
Of course, this was never for personal use, the stuff was way too strong to drink, and I don't drink cheap booze anyways. _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dwak

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 839 Location: Eastern Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cbass, did you ever try using your 'high test' in a vehicle/924?
A popular dehydrant is Zeolyte which absorbs the last bit of water and is reusable when dried.
What licencing do we need in Canada? In the States it's a simple permit.
Keep the faith,
dwak |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pat Dolan
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 26 Location: Martensville, SK Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dwak wrote: | Cool, now we're cooking with alcohol. The dehydrating is necessary if you intend to blend with gasoline but otherwiise you can use the high proof straight just fine.
dwak |
No, it is not.
What you may not realize is that researchers spend large fortunes trying to find suitably inexpensive emulsivfiers as additives to create aqueous fuels (since the advantages are so great). All you need to do is use wet ethanol and you have something much better - a genuine solution. Until the alcohol is saturated (a LOT of water), it is just that, a solution and is thus completely stable. _________________ All kinds of German cars (mostly VW-P-A)
1980 924/M471/going Audi turbodiesel!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dwak

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 839 Location: Eastern Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was under the impression that when hydrous ethanol is mixed with gasoline the water separates and settles at the bottom. Otherwise, a reasonable amount of water in straight ethanol is a good thing. I may be wrong but I don't like it.
dwak  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|