 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
-nick

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 2699 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:59 pm Post subject: Serious tuning theory/practice |
|
|
Hey all,
I like to think I know some things about how a motor works, but I can't reason out why the following is happening
I've been trying to get rid of a stumble/misfire under boost for a while. I'll feel a couple stumbles starting when the boost ramps up (only to stock ~7psi right now). The first stumble comes on under 3500rpm, then I'll feel one or two more on the way up to ~6500.
So I'm playing around tonight and decided to bump my entire ignition timing map up 2 degrees. Voila, stumble is gone! I made a run, full boost in 1st & 2nd gears before, then the same run after adding 2 degrees timing and now I get no stumble.
Another key, I didn't get the stumble before I had the motor rebuilt (again). The no-stumble motor had rings that weren't sealing well and the cranking compression was slightly less than it is now (155psi then compared to 160psi now). Compression under boost was likely much more different if compression was leaking past the rings. Even with similar air/fuel ratio's (around 11.5-12 under boost), the old motor wouldn't stumble where the new one does.
Putting the pieces together, it looks like more static compression lead to the stumble. And more advance is getting rid of it.
I can't imagine why this would be? Although I'm happy to have stumbled(!) upon it.
I bumped the timing again another 2 degrees and logged the data. I was hoping to be able to see a difference in the slope of rpm's (tracing acceleration), but I couldn't discern a difference in 1st & 2nd gear runs. The dyno may be the only way to really tune in timing changes - and I have a few more things to polish up before then (relocating the airfilter for iinstance).
Anyway, just some interesting info to pass on. Here is a copy of my timing map if anyone is interested. This one is +4 degrees over the map that was stumbling. It seems to be working fairly well.
 _________________ 1980 931S
15psi boost, MS-II, EDIS, 951 IC, custom intake, Ford 5.0L throttle body, Forge BOV, WB o2, G31 w/LSD, 964 wheels, 968 rear sway, Bilsteins, 200# Welt. springs. A laptop, and a partridge in a pear tree.
1991 964 C4 Cabriolet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
endwrench

Joined: 07 Dec 2002 Posts: 1631 Location: Victor, Montana
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is an interesting phenomenon. Didn't make much sense till I took a look at your table. I think the boost section of your table is just a little to "chunky". Though it doesn't really explain why the old engine didn't miss and the new one does. I do know I have had some trouble with the interpolation on both fuel and spark tables when I try to force too much space between them. You might try spacing your NA portion of the Kpa tables by 15 rather than 10 so as to give you a couple more rows to spread your boosted section out on.
Todd _________________ '79 924NA. Rebuilt 9.5:1, MSDS header, Mega Squirt Injection, MJLJ-EDIS Ignition, 1.6L Whipple Charger and Intercooler, 10lbs Boost, 944 Trans, Custom HD Clutch.
"simsport" said....superchargers are better than turbos its official!.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you have a datalog of the stumbling behavior? Stumbling like you descibe sounds like misfires to me, but I'd have to see a full datalog to see whats going on. Advancing your timing could make it go away for a variety of reasons that I can see, post your MSQ and a datalog of the stumble. Also note your megasquirt code revision.
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-nick

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 2699 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Todd, interesting thought. I'll try and spread out the MAP values so there isn't so much space between boost bins.
Min - sending an email with the info. I just loaded up the latest 2.872 code. _________________ 1980 931S
15psi boost, MS-II, EDIS, 951 IC, custom intake, Ford 5.0L throttle body, Forge BOV, WB o2, G31 w/LSD, 964 wheels, 968 rear sway, Bilsteins, 200# Welt. springs. A laptop, and a partridge in a pear tree.
1991 964 C4 Cabriolet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wait, your car is idling @ 27 degrees?
The reason for stumbling is "the great" 2valve head of our cars. It needs loads of advance to overcome slow combustion. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9076 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slight digression here - anyone have any idea how much advance the NA motors really like and can tolerate???
We had my teammate's racecar on the dyno last night, and after fixing a massive misfire that's been plaguing him since day 1 (turned out to be a bad distributor), we ramped up the advance to, ultimately, 46 deg total at the top end (5000rpm). I have heard that generally 42-43 degrees is what the motors really want; now I'm not so sure?
Didn't experience any pinging... _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| -nick wrote: | Todd, interesting thought. I'll try and spread out the MAP values so there isn't so much space between boost bins.
Min - sending an email with the info. I just loaded up the latest 2.872 code. |
First thing I see in these logfiles is your battery voltage seems very low, whats it show at the posts with a multimeter? the megasquirt isn't recording any battery voltages above 12 volts in these logfiles. This will cuase all kinds of weird behavior if your injector opening time and voltage correct isn't setup properly. Which it isn't from the looks.
Your running at 12.2:1 afr in the area's that stumble, I think raceboy is correct on this one, none of the other data from your logfiles suggests otherwise, you just needed more advance in that section of the table to properly ignite your rich mixture. Your not getting any AE false triggering or other weird stuff, what spark plug gap are you running? Your using EDIS right?
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-nick

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 2699 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good eye on the voltage! I hadn't noticed. I'll try and trace down where the trouble is coming from. There is a fairly large gauge +12v that goes to the unswitched pole in the MS relay board, so I can't imagine why I'd be loosing voltage. Although I did a quick check and I'm getting 13.6v at the battery while running.
This is EDIS and the spark gap is what comes out of the box for the Bosch copper plugs. I just check to make sure they're all the same, although I don't remember what that gap is. Same as stock I believe.
What kind of voltages are you recording Min?
Also, what's wrong with 27deg advance at idle under vacuum? What's stock? It can't be that far off. _________________ 1980 931S
15psi boost, MS-II, EDIS, 951 IC, custom intake, Ford 5.0L throttle body, Forge BOV, WB o2, G31 w/LSD, 964 wheels, 968 rear sway, Bilsteins, 200# Welt. springs. A laptop, and a partridge in a pear tree.
1991 964 C4 Cabriolet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stock is like 10 degrees BTDC @ 900-950 rpm. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| -nick wrote: | | Good eye on the voltage! I hadn't noticed. I'll try and trace down where the trouble is coming from. There is a fairly large gauge +12v that goes to the unswitched pole in the MS relay board, so I can't imagine why I'd be loosing voltage. Although I did a quick check and I'm getting 13.6v at the battery while running. |
Then something is up for sure, going to have to trace it and see why the megasquirt isn't showing the same voltage as your battery. You want your injectors and the megasquirt to see the same voltage. So that any compensation the ECU attempts to make is becuase of a real value. Idealy you want both to see 13.2 or more. Otherwise battery compensation kicks in, and if its not set perfectly (which is extremely hard to find out and set) then things will go weird. You can definately tune around it, but better to figure out whats up.
| -nick wrote: | | This is EDIS and the spark gap is what comes out of the box for the Bosch copper plugs. I just check to make sure they're all the same, although I don't remember what that gap is. Same as stock I believe. |
Ok, your going to want to change that, EDIS is far more powerful than the stock ignition system, I noticed a hit to my butt dyno increasing the spark plug gap on my car. I would recommend changing it from .024 (I believe thats stock) up to at least double that, I'm running .055 I believe and havn't had any problems, I'd start there, and then if you find your having spark blowout problems, slowly decrease the gap until it stops. when I was doing research on it, turbo cars running EDIS were running .065 gap if I recall correctly, so I wouldn't worry about it unless you experiance spark blowout.
| -nick wrote: | | What kind of voltages are you recording Min? |
When my alternator isn't flaking out hardcore, 13.2-13.6 at the megasquirt.
| -nick wrote: | | Also, what's wrong with 27deg advance at idle under vacuum? What's stock? It can't be that far off. |
I run around 27 deg's of advance at idle, I find it runs smoother with more advance at idle. Also helps throttle response imo. I'd like to hear what raceboy thinks though, I trust his opinion. I found myself that the idle quality dropped significantly when I ran less advance.
I'd be very interested in having you increase your spark gap alot, and then changing the timing back down 2 degree's. Just to see if you experiance the same problem with the larger gapping. Would be a valuable datapoint I think.
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 924RACR wrote: | Slight digression here - anyone have any idea how much advance the NA motors really like and can tolerate???
We had my teammate's racecar on the dyno last night, and after fixing a massive misfire that's been plaguing him since day 1 (turned out to be a bad distributor), we ramped up the advance to, ultimately, 46 deg total at the top end (5000rpm). I have heard that generally 42-43 degrees is what the motors really want; now I'm not so sure?
Didn't experience any pinging... |
I'm not sure how much advance they really like, but I think your teammates racecar is running so rich that it won't ping easily. I'm pretty sure that generally 42-43 is what they want when they are running a proper afr. (13:1 ish for a NA car)
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I run 10-12 degrees @ idle and it idles very smoothly + emissions are well below our limits, can pass the emission test easily. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
GREAT STUFF GUYS!!!!
Keep it coming, I'm almost convinced to head down this path on my 80 931S.... _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Raceboy wrote: | | I run 10-12 degrees @ idle and it idles very smoothly + emissions are well below our limits, can pass the emission test easily. |
Ok....... I can get my car running "very smoothly" at 10 degree's as well... But my question was, is there a reason we shouldn't be running that much advance at idle? I'm guessing from your emissions comment its a emissions thing. Could you clarify? Thanks.
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.carprogrammer.com/Z28/PCM/Ignition/idle%20spark%20tuning.htm
Doing more searching, but his conclusion is "In conclusion, my hypothesis that more timing consumes more fuel, was incorrect to a point.
It appears that more timing burns fuel more efficiently, requiring less fuel and less air at idle."
Less fuel, less air, sounds like a good thing?
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|